« Thursday February 28 | Main | Monday March 3 »

Comments

S. Elkins

The comments by Brian Strutton of the GMB in response to your report is a frivolous response, he should be made to acknowledge the difference in enhanced benefits generated by switching the Local Auth Workers scheme to 60ths for every year of scheme membership of final salary instead of 80ths,notwithstanding the flexibility of potential to retire early given up by the scrapping of the rule of 85 and the slight increase in the employee's contribution. In this era of pension change for the last ten years, for almost all sectors of society Local Authority workers should be no longer paid relatively low salary with the enticement of a good pension scheme, they should be paid the private sector rate and a commensurate style of pension scheme that they can choose to pay more into out of salary should they wish. Another example of why the state pension scheme should be enhanced and be made compulsory to all National Insurance payees as a decent basic level of income to be supplemented by employer schemes or private schemes as workers choose dependant upon their retirement expectations. Council Tax needs to be as transparent as possible!

J D Bev

The blame for this state of affairs lies with the Government!
One of the first things Gordon Brown did when he became Chancellor was to raid the Dividends paid on Pension Funds.
Prior to this raid the Shropshire County Pension Fund was fully funded. That is the income from both employers and employees contributions paid for retired members pensions.
The Chancellors raid meant that the Council Tax payers have had to make up the increasing short fall.
Local Government workers have had to pay a contribution to their Pensions and are NOT getting them free. They also pay income tax.

The comments to this entry are closed.