Blogs



















Blog powered by TypePad

« Non-job of the week | Main | Minitruth »

July 31, 2008

Dependent Watchdog

"As the independent gas and electricity watchdog, our mission is simple: to get the best deal we can for energy consumers."

So says energywatch [sic]. And over the last 24 hours they have been sounding off mightily over the hike in British Gas prices. Indeed, Campaign Director Adam Scorer has just laid into Centrica for daring to increase prices while still in profit:

"Prices are going up because £992 million profit in six months isn't enough. British Gas customers, still reeling from 35 per cent price hikes, might have expected Centrica to be losing money. They will be staggered at the rude health of Centrica's half year profits. Customers will be outraged to learn that while they ponder how to make ends meet Centrica’s shareholders are enjoying an increase in their dividends."

Well, that's fair enough you say. Independent consumer watchdogs are quite entitled to put their case, even if it is little more than a left-wing anti-market rant.

Well yes.

Except that energywatch is not independent. It is a tax-funded quango which costs us £15m pa (2006-07 Report and Accounts). Its rants are entirely dependent on us taxpayers for their funding.

It gets better. In 2006-07, Campaign Director Adam Scorer got paid no less than £75,000 (including pension accrual). His boss Allan Assher got paid c £125,000 (including pension). Of our money.

Do you want to pay for this nonsense?

No, of course not.

That's another £15m pa saved.

(Let's hope George Osborne is keeping a note of all these cost cutting ideas).

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83550306a69e200e553e274a18834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Dependent Watchdog:

Comments

Two things that seem to be TPA policy that I DO NOT agree with:
(1)The Civil List should be scrapped. I do not want to pay for the Royal Family (even though it is bandied about that they "only cost us 65p each per year") (2)The Queen should be charged a rent for her residences.(3) Every person in this country should be on a national DNA database. Ken Partington

The following are my views on what seems to be TPA policy:

(1)The Civil List should be scrapped - I do not want to pay for the Royal Family (even though it is bandied about that they "only cost us 65p each per year") (2)The Queen should be charged a rent for her residences.(3) Every person in this country should be on a national DNA database. Ken Partington

Re your comments on Energywatch. It's good
informing us what's wrong,but what do they do about it?.As with most politicians they rant and rave but never do anything.We need a change of system where we make the decisions.

I agree on most of what you had to say. If I may add that the new FHA bill passed by congress and signed by the president should help a lot of distressed homeowners

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment