Britain pays £19.6bn too much in green taxes

• IPCC cost of carbon emissions estimate shows Britain pays £19.6bn too much in green taxes.
• Even the Government's own figures indicate that we are paying £7.9bn too much.
• Detailed area-by-area breakdown shows wide variation across the country - and the poor are hit hardest.

Download the full report (PDF)

Download the Green Taxes Database

New research from The TaxPayers' Alliance (TPA) has revealed that green taxes are far higher than is necessary to offset the cost of UK carbon emissions. UN IPCC figures on the UK's carbon footprint indicate British taxpayers pay £19.6 billion a year more than is necessary, whilst even the British Government's own estimates indicate that we are paying £7.9 billion too much - money that taxpayers feeling the pinch of the credit crunch can ill afford.

Detailed local analysis of the green taxes and carbon emissions of the population of each local council area across the country reveals that there is a wide variation between different areas, particularly between urban and rural areas. A full list detailing the amount of excess green taxes paid per person for people in each local authority area in the UK is included in the report. A searchable database giving figures for every area in the UK can be found here.

In 2007, the TPA's groundbreaking report, "The Case Against Further Green Taxes" marked the start of the tide turning against green taxation, and was widely credited with preventing the Conservative Party adopting Zac Goldsmith's controversial green tax policy proposals. In the aftermath of the 2008 Budget, the TPA was the first organisation to flag up the proposed increase in vehicle excise duty as a costly threat. Now, the TPA's latest report demonstrates just how much people are suffering under the green tax burden and shows that even the Government's own figures show they are exploiting green taxes to raise massive amounts of revenue.

Key Findings

• In 2007-08, the total burden of green taxes and charges, after deducting road spending, was £24.2 billion, up from £22.7 billion in 2006-07.
• Taking the IPCC's estimates of the costs of greenhouse gas emissions, the social cost of Britain’s entire output of greenhouse gases was £4.6 billion in 2007, meaning Britain pays £19.6 billion too much in green taxes, or £783.34 too much per household. Even the Government's own estimates of the cost of greenhouse gas emissions as being £16.3 billion reveal we are being overtaxed by £7.9 billion - equal to £315.81 per household.
• Therefore, even on the Government's own estimate of the cost of carbon emissions, green taxes are too high.
• The burden varies significantly between suburban/rural areas and urban districts. For examle, residents of Maldon pay £607 per person in excess green taxes compared to residents of Camden who pay £62 each in excess green taxes (using the IPCC estimate). Out of 434 local authority areas, only five avoid excess green taxes under the IPCC estimate of the social cost of carbon emissions, and only 12 under the Government's estimate. There is a full local breakdown, area by area, of the UK included in the report.
• Excessive green taxes hit poorer people hardest, hurt the competitiveness of British firms, cause Britain to export emissions and fall disproportionately on residents of rural and suburban areas.

Matthew Sinclair, a Policy Analyst at the TaxPayers' Alliance and expert in green taxation, said:

"Green taxes are set far higher than is necessary to pay for our carbon footprint, which loads an unfair burden onto hard pressed British families and businesses. With the credit crunch squeezing household budgets, people can ill afford this extra tax grab. It's dishonest and unjust for politicians to wrap revenue raising tax hikes in a green banner. The Government are talking about raising taxes even further, but our conclusions show that green taxes should be kept as they are or cut."

Download the full report (PDF)

Download the Green Taxes Database

If you support our campaign for lower taxes please join and become part of our grassroots campaign - for FREE - here

Comments

[ukipwebmaster]

Watch out for the new short film about our energy costs, 'Out of control', released on the eve of the UKIP national conference.

[Kenherts]

Brown has always been a thieving liar taxing everything in sight. We now have a situation that it will no longer be affordable to go to work because Brown is pricing many off the roads. Council tax is another killer for low paid and pensioners alike. These bunch of crooks have destroyed this country.

[Paul Lockett]

Having read the report, it highlights perfectly the reason why green taxes should not be reduced.

Irrespective of whether or not the pricing of externalities by green taxes is accurate, the government collects many times more revenue through income tax, even though earning money has no externalities.

If there were no income tax, VAT, etc. then there may be a debate to be had about reducing green taxes, but until then, it is the wrong target.

[Robert G]

Sense there is no scientific proof man made CO2 is causing global warming any amount over £0 in green taxes is to much. Face it the entire global warming scam is a government funded scare tactic to make people feel good about the only solution the government has to offer, TAXES.
GW is a scam and any politician that uses the words global warming should be tared, feathered and run out of town on a rail.

[Thomas Brunswick]

Has nobody the courage to tell this corrupt, mendacious and incompetent governement that climate change is caused by alterations in the sun's magnetic field and that there is no way in which this is affected by the CO2 content of the earth's atmosphere.

The magnetic field affects the ease with which high energy cosmic rays reach the upper atmosphere and form nuclei on which water condenses. This affects solar heating of the earth's surface, but the sun cannot be taxed so we must make do with the story preferred by politicians.

[B Ballantine]

If global warming is genuine, the gov could use the £19.6 billion to put the country on a 'war footing'! Why not requisition British industry to equip every household with solar panels, wind generators and proper insulation to fight this phenomena. But then this government couldn't do that without spending £19 billion of it employing the desk jockeys and jobsworths to administer it!