Blogs















Blog powered by TypePad

Prisons

Friday, April 18, 2008

Daily Mirror: Outrage at £750K for junkies forced to quit heroin in jail

A £750,000 payout to nearly 200 prisoners for giving up heroin was yesterday branded an "outrage".

The junkie cons won £3,800 each, claiming their human rights were abused. Lawyers' bills could up the cost to taxpayers to £1million. Tory MP Andrew Rosindell fumed: "It's an outrageous waste of public money."

The TaxPayers' Alliance added: "If you're in jail you should be forced to be 'clean'." The inmates claimed their rights were breached when forced to do "cold turkey" instead of getting the drug substitute methadone.

A test case involving six of 197 prisoners was due to heard in 2006. But ministers caved in and settled out of court.

Advertisement
Jails involved included Exeter, Devon and Hull.

The payouts emerged from Parliamentary Hansard records.

The Prison Service said: "We pay out only when instructed by the courts or where legal advice suggests it will save money."

BACK OF THE NET

John Marshall got £5k compo for breaking a leg playing soccer in jail in Inverness.

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

Daily Express: £80k expert to help prisoners shop for treats

by Cyril Dixon

Matthew Elliott, chief executive of the TaxPayers' Alliance, said the "bizarre" move showed how ministers had the wrong priorities.

He said: "When the Government is struggling with the simple things, such as teaching our children to read and write and making sure hospitals are clean and hygienic, it seems bizarre that they're paying such a big salary to the top prison shop assistant.

"Employing someone to make sure inmates get their favourite Pot Noddles will make them even more likely to commit crime when their sentence comes to an end."

Friday, November 02, 2007

Daily Mail: Killer demands £50,000 compensation for 'slopping out' cell toilet

By Arthur Martin

A murderer who sexually assaulted his victim as she lay dying is demanding £50,000 in compensation after having to "slop out" his prison toilet.

Graham Hall, 28, claims he was forced to empty his toilet the "old fashioned way" after the sanitation system in his cell broke down during the night.

He believes his experience in Albany Jail, a maximum security prison on the Isle of Wight, was a breach of his human rights and made his personality disorder worse.

Hall, who killed a 76-year-old widow by stabbing her 51 times after watching a violent video, has been given permission by a judge to sue The Ministry of Justice and is thought to be receiving legal aid.

Inmates at the prison have toilets in their cells which have a modern flush system. If this sanitation system fails during the day, they are taken to toilets in another part of the jail by wardens.

However, at night prisoners are not allowed out of their cells because of the threat some of them pose to the safety of the staff.

A Ministry of Justice source said: "His case is a test case, and if successful, it will allow 40 other prisoners to make similar claims.

"All prisoners have toilets which work properly and there is no slopping out. But if the night sanitation system fails, they cannot be let out of their cells because some of them are too dangerous.

"When a toilet breaks down in a home in the UK, people will use a bucket of water to slop out until they can get it fixed. They don't sue."

Hall, from Egremont in Cumbria, was just 18 when he was jailed for life at Carlisle Crown Court in March 1998 for murdering Jane Brown Chare.

He had pleaded not guilty to murder, but admitted her manslaughter on grounds of diminished responsibility. However, the jury took just 20 minutes to convict him of murder.

After he was sentenced the detective leading the murder case described Hall as "an evil and scheming individual".

Mrs Chare, who lived alone in her bungalow in Egremont was murdered in June 1997. Hall, who was swigging from a vodka bottle while staggering home after watching the blood-thirsty video Dead Presidents, broke in and stabbed the pensioner repeatedly with two knives from her kitchen drawer.

Shadow Justice Secretary Nick Herbert described the compensation claim as "barmy" and one that "should be dismissed out of hand".

"The suggestion that a blocked loo violates anyone's rights, let alone a prisoner's, undermines genuine human rights causes and demonstrates once again that human rights laws have gone too far," he said.

"If legal aid really is being used to fund this claim it would add insult to injury and be an outrageous abuse of taxpayers funds."

Matthew Elliott, Chief Executive of The TaxPayers' Alliance, added: "With some hospitals having too few nurses to help elderly patients visit the bathroom, it shows a warped set of priorities to allow this convicted criminal the chance to claim compensation for having to essentially clean his cell.

"The right to a clean toilet is suspended when you commit a crime. If he gets a payout, it will sicken every family affected by MRSA and all right-minded people. Calling it a waste of money is putting it lightly."

A spokesman from the Ministry of Justice said: "This is an ongoing legal action and therefore it would be inappropriate to comment on the case."

In June it emerged that millions of pounds of taxpayers' money could be paid out to prisoners who are kept in jail beyond their release dates because of a backlog in parole hearings.

Hundreds of inmates, including murderers and rapists, are preparing to submit claims for damages, arguing that the delay breached their human rights.

Nearly 1,000 prisoners have had their parole hearings deferred in the past three years, with an average delay of five months.

Wednesday, September 19, 2007

34 killer cons get jail cars

By Graeme Wilson

The TaxPayers' Alliance said the perk "makes a mockery of our justice system."

Daily Mail: Rapists and killers buy their own cars for day trips from open prison

Blair Gibbs, of the TaxPayers' Alliance, said:  'Privileges like this - which are always defended by the prison reform lobby - make a mockery of our justice system.

'As taxes have risen, many ordinary law-abiding families make regular sacrifices to keep a car on the road as their only mode of transport.  It is a complete insult to taxpayers that their hard-earned money should be spent housing and feeding criminals in prison, who are then allowed the luxury of buying their own motors to cruise around in.

'Where is the justice in a system that allows murderers who are still serving their sentence the right to afford a smart new car, while millions of ordinary people who've never committed a crime can't even begin to afford the same?'

Monday, July 16, 2007

Daily Mail: Jailed addicts to get safer syringes on the taxpayer

By James Slack, Home Affairs Editor

CONVICTS are to receive Government help to ensure they can inject heroin safely inside jail. Under the dramatic relaxation of drugs policy, criminals will be given taxpayer-funded disinfectant tablets to clean their syringes.

The Conservatives said the ' outrageous' decision effectively condoned drug use by inmates, who are supposed to be given help to quit Class-A substances. Theft and robbery to pay for drug addiction is one of the main reason criminals end up in jail in the first place, they said.

Possession of injecting equipment by prisoners is illegal, but officials said they had a right to be protected from blood infections. There will be concern the decision to be implemented by the Ministry of Justice later this year is the start of a Government retreat from trying to get inmates off drugs. It follows a bruising human rights defeat in which the Prison Service was ordered to pay £750,000 to nearly 200 drug addicts who experienced withdrawal symptoms after they were forced to go 'cold turkey'.

Shadow Home Secretary David Davis said: 'This is exactly the wrong approach and it is outrageous the Government is content to allow it. Drugs are a scourge on society which fuel much other crime. Prisons should be places of rehabilitation where prisoners are got off drugs, not left on them. That is why we would strengthen residential and prison drug rehabilitation places to get people off drugs and start reducing crime.'

Yesterday it also emerged that homosexual inmates are to be given access to gay pornography to ensure that they do not feel discriminated against. The Prison Service has ruled they should be allowed any type of explicit 'top shelf' material which can be bought in a high street newsagent.

The decision was taken after gay inmates complained they were receiving 'unequal treatment', because heterosexual prisoners are already allowed pornographic magazines.  Guidance given to governors says the magazines 'should be allowed into the establishment and that gay/bisexual prisoners should not be discriminated against'.

Matthew Elliott, chief executive of the TaxPayers' Alliance, said: ' Prisoners should not be allowed any porn gay or straight when they're serving time, and neither should they be provided with drugs paraphernalia. The Human Rights Act has obliterated common sense from our criminal and legal system. The idea that families and pensioners are paying higher taxes to fund drug-fuelled, porn sessions for crooks will offend all right-minded, decent people.'

But Karen Munro, of the Prison Service's briefing and casework unit, said: 'The possession of injecting equipment is strictly prohibited in prisons and liable for punishment. Any equipment found is confiscated.

'It is, however, recognised that blood borne viruses are a serious public health problem, and are more prevalent in the prison environment than in the community. The Ministry of Justice and the Department of Health are therefore working to introduce disinfectant tablets in prisons.

'These are a generic cleaning item that can be used to clean shaving equipment, cutlery, crockery, cell toilets and toothbrushes and may be used to sterilise illicitly held needles which may be used for drug-injecting or tattooing.'