Blogs















Blog powered by TypePad

Motorist

Wednesday, August 27, 2008

Liverpool Daily Post: Helicopter speed trap

MOTORISTS are being warned they could be caught speeding by a police helicopter armed with a radar detection device.

More that 20 signs are being put up in Essex telling drivers that police are watching from the sky.

Essex County Council - which is erecting the helicopter warning signs - says the aircraft has a "skyshout" public address system which could be used to "warn of a detection".

Campaign group The TaxPayers' Alliance said it was a "bizarre" way to spend public money.

The Sun: Cop sky cam row

A BID to catch speeding motorists by using a police helicopter was yesterday branded dangerous and a waste of cash.

More that 20 signs are being put up in Essex warning drivers a chopper with a radar detection device and number- plate recognition system may be watching them.

It also has a "skyshout" public address speaker to tell motorists they have been caught.

But the TaxPayers' Alliance said the signs were a danger, encouraging drivers to look up and take their eyes off the road. And using a chopper costing £ 1,000-an-hour to run would be "a very expensive speed camera".

Evening Standard: Police use £1,000-an-hour helicopter to trap speeding drivers

BENEDICT MOORE-BRIDGER

A POLICE helicopter targeting speeding motorists at a cost of £1,000 an hour has been attacked by campaign groups as dangerous and expensive.

Drivers breaking the law will be identified by the helicopter's radar detection service, which is also equipped with the "Skyshout" public address system to warn drivers they have been caught.

More than 20 signs are being put up in high-risk accident areas across Essex warning drivers that officers are watching them from the sky.

But taxpayers' campaign groups said the signs and the use of the helicopter to trap speeders were a "bizarre" way to spend public money, while others labelled the scheme "appalling".

The idea was devised by the Essex Casualty Reduction Board, a body which operates speed cameras and is made up of representatives from local authorities and the police.

The helicopter uses GPS mapping software, thermal imaging, and Automated Number Plate Recognition which can read a car's registration plate from 700ft. A spokesman for the Taxpayers' Alliance said: "Do they really need to be spending money on signs warning that a helicopter may be in the air at a time when taxpayers, motorists and apparently local councils are feeling the pinch?"

AA president Edmund King said the move could distract drivers, saying: "Putting these signs up could be counter-productive and could lead to more collisions because people are looking at the sky."

Essex Police said the helicopter would only be used to track speeders when it was already flying - not launched on specific speed-detection sorties. Adam Pipe, the force's Traffic Management Officer, said: "Essex Police is keen to use and develop ideas and strategies that look to address and enhance driver and rider behaviour in an effort to reduce the number of people killed and seriously injured on the roads and will embrace any idea or strategy that supports that cause."

A spokesman for Essex County Council said: "New distinctive signs have been designed to warn motorists of the possibility of detection of offences by air.

"Motorists in Essex are being warned their activities are likely to be picked up from the sky if they drive dangerously."

Daily Star: Spy in the sky shock

MOTORISTS are being warned that they could be caught speeding by a police helicopter armed with radar.

More that 20 signs are being put up in Essex telling drivers police are watching from the sky.

Essex Council says the aircraft - thought to cost about £1,000 an hour to run - has a "skyshout" public address system which could be used to "warn of a detection".

The TaxPayers' Alliance said it was a "bizarre" way to spend public money.

BBC News Online: Helicopter to snoop on speeders

New signs have been installed warning drivers they could be caught speeding by a police helicopter armed with a radar detection device.

Essex County Council have put up more than 20 signs around the county telling drivers that police are watching from the sky.

The aircraft is equipped with a "skyshout" public address system which can warn drivers of a pursuit.

The council said the Essex Casualty Reduction Board put forward the plan.

Board chairman Norman Hume said the signs were primarily aimed at motorcyclists.

'Expensive camera'

"We are seeing accidents in Essex dramatically reduced as a result of our intervention and education campaign, but we need to make more of an impact on motorcycle accidents," he said.

"There is a perception that it is sometimes easier for motorcyclists to evade detection of offences because of the speed they travel at.

"We feel that signs warning of the likelihood of detection by air will be an extra incentive - particularly for motorcyclists, and all motorists - to drive safely and help us to reduce accidents further."

Adam Pipe, Essex Police's Traffic Management Officer, added police were keen to use new techniques to "reduce the number of people killed and seriously injured on the roads".

"Use of the force helicopter will enable officers to obtain video evidence of offences including excess speed," he added.

The TaxPayers' Alliance said the helicopter - thought to cost about £1,000 an hour to run - would be "a very expensive speed camera".

Birmingham Post: Watch the skies - if you are speeding

Motorists could be caught speeding - by a police helicopter armed with a radar detection device.

More than 20 signs are being put up in Essex telling drivers that police are watching from the sky.

Essex County Council - which is erecting the helicopter warning signs - says the aircraft is equipped with a "skyshout" public address system which could be used to "warn of a detection".

A taxpayers' campaign group said the signs and the use of the helicopter to trap speeders were a "bizarre" way to spend public money.

The TaxPayers' Alliance said the helicopter - thought to cost about pounds 1,000 an hour to run - would be "a very expensive speed camera".

And a spokesman said signs warning motorists of a helicopter was "possibly not the best way to encourage drivers to keep their eyes on the road".

The force helicopter is equipped with a special Automated Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) device which can read a car number plate from 700 feet and radar speed detection.

Officials said the idea was the brainchild of the Essex Casualty Reduction Board, a body which operates speed cameras and is made up of representatives from local authorities and the police.

AA president Edmund King said the move could distract motorists.

"Signs warning of the possibility there's a chopper overhead are likely to make people look up," he said.

"People will think 'I'm doing four miles over the speed limit - is there a chopper overhead?'.

"In terms of making the roads safer, it would be much more productive to put more cops in cars."

An Essex Police spokeswoman said the helicopter would only be used to track speeders when it was already flying - not launched on specific speed detection missions.

She said police felt that the idea would be an extra deterrent to speeders and help save lives.

She denied that the use of a helicopter was an indication that speed cameras and anti-speeding campaigns were not effective enough.

Essex Echo: Heli-cops to spy on drivers in Essex

MOTORISTS are being warned they could be caught speeding by a police helicopter armed with a radar detection device.

More than 20 signs are being put up across the county telling drivers police are watching from the sky.

Essex County Council – which is putting up the helicopter warning signs – says the aircraft is equipped with a “Skyshout” public address system which could be used to “warn of a detection”.

Norman Hume, chairman of the Essex Casualty Reduction Board, which aims to lower road casualties, said: “We are seeing accidents in Essex dramatically reduced as a result of our intervention and education campaign but need to make more impact on motorcycle accidents.

“There is a perception it is sometimes easier for motorcyclists to evade detection of offences because of the speed they travel at.

“We feel signs warning of the likelihood of detection by air will be an extra incentive for motorcyclists in particular, and all motorists, to drive safely.”

The police helicopter is equipped with a special number plate recognition device which can read vehicle number plates from 700 ft and has radar speed detection.

But, a campaign group said the idea represented a “bizarre” use of public money. The TaxPayers’ Alliance said the helicopter – at a cost of about £1,000 an hour to run – would be “a very expensive speed camera”. A spokesman added signs warning motorists of a helicopter was “possibly not the best way to encourage drivers to keep their eyes on the road”.

The signs are being trialled on the B184 from Ongar to Dunmow, the B1057 from Great Dunmow to Finching-field and the B1012 Lower Burnham Road.

Yorkshire Post: Helicopter to catch out speeding drivers

Motorists are being warned that they could be caught speeding by a police helicopter armed with a radar detection device.
More than 20 signs are being put up in Essex by the county council telling drivers that police are watching from the sky.

The council says the helicopter is equipped with a "skyshout" public address system that could be used to "warn of a detection".

But the TaxPayers' Alliance said the helicopter, thought to cost about £1,000 an hour to run, would be "a very expensive speed camera" – and signs warning of it was "possibly not the best way to encourage drivers to keep their eyes on the road".

County council officials said it was the brainchild of the Essex Casualty Reduction Board, which operates speed cameras and is made up of local authority and police representatives.

Board chairman Norman Hume said the signs were primarily aimed at motorcyclists.

"There is a perception that it is sometimes easier for motorcyclists to evade detection of offences because of the speed they travel at.

"We feel that signs warning of the likelihood of detection by air will be an extra incentive – part-icularly for motorcyclists, and all motorists – to drive safely and help us to reduce accidents further."

Saturday, August 23, 2008

The Sun: Road dig is £5m waste

DRIVERS were outraged yesterday after bungling road chiefs announced plans to rebuild a motorway lane they dug up less than a year ago - costing taxpayers £ 5.3million.

The third lane on the M56 to Manchester was replaced with a filter lane at junction 7 but motorists then faced even longer queues to the city centre.

The £ 1.5million scheme to boost safety and cut congestion caused more road jams and triggered hundreds of complaints.

Bosses blamed a traffic simulator, saying it underestimated the number of commuters. They agreed to rebuild the old lane - but said it will cost an extra £ 3.8million.

Now drivers face three more months of road misery as the lane is restored while the hard shoulder is turned into a new slip road.

Furious taxpayers last night claimed their cash was being wasted. Sales rep Caroline Anderson, 41, of Hale, said: "Most employees would get the sack for blowing £ 1.5million of company cash. Yet these people get to spend £ .3.8million more."

Mark Wallace, of the Taxpayers' Alliance, said: "It smacks of serious mismanagement."

The Highway Agency's Neal Symmons said: "We have listened to drivers."

Thursday, August 21, 2008

Lincolnshire Echo: 'We review our car parking tariffs every year'

Matthew Elliott

Chief executive of the TaxPayers' Alliance

"It's outrageous Government ministers are going round in public claiming to understand financial pressures people are under, but behind closed doors they urge councils to squeeze even more money."

Rod Williamson

City services manager, Lincoln City Council

"We benchmark our charges against 65 other local authorities. We review our tariffs every year and although prices can rise, we always ensure that we remain good value for money."

Andrew Davis

Director of the Environmental Transport Association

"Local businesses often object to parking charges, but the car park that is constantly full because it is too cheap is not bringing custom to local shops."

Tuesday, August 19, 2008

Public Servant: Town centre parking 'should cost more'

Parking costs in town centres should be increased to cut congestion and encourage people to find alternative forms of transport, according to local government minister John Healey.

In a speech to the Local Government Association, he said: "Only one in five councils are using charging to the full potential. Not just to cover costs but to shape their area."

In response, LGA chairman Sir Simon Milton said: "Local councils have to make tough choices between spending cuts, council tax rises and charging fees. Charges and fees would be better exercised through a buoyant, open and progressive local tax system, but under the current system, councils are doing the best they can to put people first with the tools they've got."

The Tories' local government spokesman Eric Pickles said it was "shocking that Whitehall is pressing councils to use parking charges as a cash cow to raid the pockets of public". And Matthew Elliott, chief executive of the TaxPayers' Alliance, commented: "It's outrageous that government ministers are … claiming to understand the financial pressures people are under, but behind closed doors they are urging councils to squeeze everyone for even more money."

John Wright, the national chairman of the Federation of Small Businesses, claimed that Healey didn’t seem to know what he was talking about and that local authorities using "excessive" parking charges to raise revenue are "killing" town centres.

Wright added: "These proposals are diabolical in respect of enabling local high streets and local business to survive. We have found that where high streets are surviving there is free parking and the minister should be aware of this."

However, Healey told The Daily Telegraph: "It is up to local councils to make these decisions. If they choose to do so, it must not be used to make a profit and or as an alternative to cutting out waste and driving down expenditure."

Daily Telegraph: Motorists should pay more to park in town centres, says Government minister

Motorists should pay more to park in town centres to force them to walk more and reduce traffic congestion, according to a Government minister.

Local Government minister John Healey said that local councils should charge more for basic services such as off-street parking, despite people in many parts of the country experiencing inflation-busting council tax rises.

In a speech to the Local Government Association, he said: "Only one in five councils are using charging to the full potential. Not just to cover costs but to shape their area."

In a clear sign that he believes motorists should be targeted, Mr Healey said that charging more would result in "reducing congestion, improving levels of health and exercise, encouraging the use of local shops".

It comes after it was disclosed that the Government is set to press ahead with a series of technology trials for a national road pricing scheme, which could lead to drivers paying up to £1.30 a mile during peak periods.

The Daily Telegraph has been running a campaign calling on the Government to offer a fairer deal to motorists at a time that has seen soaring fuel prices and plans for changes to vehicle excise duty which will leave most motorists with larger bills.

Despite soaring council tax bills, the money raked in by councils just from fees has more than doubled from £5.5billion in 1997/98 when Labour came to power to £12.6billion in 2007/8.

Much of this has come from higher charges for parking and use of leisure centres, as well as other fees such as those for planning applications.

The amount of money made by councils from parking charges alone jumped by 14 per cent in three years to reach £635million in 2006-07.

Council tax bills rose by 10 per cent over the same period, with town hall revenues for all local authorities across the UK rising from £20.1billion in 2004/5 to £22.2billion in 2006/7.

In Westminster, central London, motorists using a council car park can be charged up to £6 for one hour or as much as £35 for nine hours.

Small business groups called into question the claim that charging more for parking could help protect small shops by encouraging people to walk to their local store.

John Wright, the national chairman of the Federation of Small Businesses, said: "The practice of local authorities using excessive parking charges to raise revenue is killing town centres.

"The minister doesn't seem as though he knows what he is talking about. One of the most important aspects of this is to encourage people to use the high street, a lot of businesses rely on passing trade but which customer is going to pay parking charges if they just wish to call in for a bottle of milk at a local high street shop.

"These proposals are diabolical in respect of enabling local high streets and local business to survive. We have found that where high streets are surviving there is free parking and the minister should be aware of this.

"Is Mr Healey then going to insist on all supermarkets charging for their car parking?"

Officials close to Mr Healey said he was referring to charges for council car parks, rather than increases in on street parking, as well as other council-run services such as local theatres.

Mr Healey told The Daily Telegraph: "It is up to local councils to make these decisions. If they choose to do so, it must not be used to make a profit and or as an alternative to cutting out waste and driving down expenditure."

But Eric Pickles, the Tories' Local Government spokesman, said Labour was intent on "clobbering the public with another Gordon Brown stealth tax".

He said: "It is shocking that Whitehall is pressing councils to use parking charges as a cash cow to raid the pockets of public. You would have thought the excessive rises over the past decade in council tax would be enough.

"Ministers are calling on councils to use to squeeze more money out of the public who are already struggling with the spiralling cost of living."

Matthew Elliott, Chief Executive of the TaxPayers' Alliance, added: "The last thing taxpayers need is even more stealth taxes and charges.

"It's outrageous that Government ministers are going round in public claiming to understand the financial pressures people are under, but behind closed doors they are urging councils to squeeze everyone for even more money.

"Councils already raise far too much by charging for things that used to be included in return for council tax."

Mr Healey also revealed that the Government was considering "new funding tools" for local authorities to help them raise more cash.

He said: "When I debate the economic role of local Government, I always hear the argument for more freedoms and financial powers. I'm always receptive. And I'm looking at new funding tools at the moment.

"Half of councils don't even have a clear policy on charging to guide their decisions on how to use their powers."

Town hall leaders defended Mr Healey's call for councils to charge more for local services.

Sir Simon Milton, chairman of the Local Government Assocation, said: "Local councils have to make tough choices between spending cuts, council tax rises and charging fees.

"In certain parts of the country the money councils have received from central government will make it the worst settlement for a decade.

"That different councils have different charging policies should come as no surprise. Every area has its own unique issues and councils will rightly adopt charging policies to local circumstances.

"Charges and fees would be better exercised through a buoyant, open and progressive local tax system, but under the current system, councils are doing the best they can to put people first with the tools they've got."

Although council parking fines are set by Whitehall, town halls are free to charge what they wish for car parks and on street parking.

While cash raised from fines must go back into transport, councils are free to use remaining parking revenue as they see fit. Mr Healey's remarks drew an angry response from motoring organisations.

"Drivers are already being hit with expensive fuel and the increased cost of a tax disc," said Paul Watters, head of public affairs at the AA.

"If they arrive at their destination and find that they have to pay an extortionate amount, they will vote with their wheels and go elsewhere."

Sheila Rainger, head of campaigns at the RAC Foundation, said: "Charging for a scarce resource is one way of allocating. But city centres are in competition with out of town retail, where parking is free.

"Parking has always been a service to communities and not a revenue-raiser. Motorists are fed up with being seen as wallets on wheels by local and national government.

"Drivers should not be expected to pay for meals on wheels or other services, I am worried that this could be the thrust of Mr Healey's remarks."

Monday, August 18, 2008

Western Mail: Safety campaigners defend speed cameras

Ben Glaze, Western Mail

ROAD safety campaigners last night defended the use of cameras to catch motorists who flout the law, after it emerged drivers are fined nearly £10m a year through fixed penalties.

An investigation by the Western Mail’s sister paper Wales on Sunday yesterday revealed Motorists across the country were fined £9,607,560 in 12 months for speeding or ignoring red lights.

Opponents claimed the cameras were just another method of generating revenue and branded fixed penalties “a stealth tax”. But supporters said they were vital tools in improving road safety and cutting deaths on Wales’ roads.

Wales 739 camera sites, which include 159 fixed devices, 538 locations where police use radar guns and 42 red light cameras, are operated by two organisations. The total fines revenue does not include motorists stopped by police or those who choose to go to court.

Fixed penalties levied on 160,126 drivers across the four police force areas in 2006 totalled:

£3,569,460 in North Wales;

£3,118,200 in Gwent;

£2,207,880 in South Wales;

£712,020 in Dyfed Powys.

Mid and South Wales Safety Camera Partnership manager Jim Moore said last night: “While the focus of the statistics is revenue generated, we must not forget that safety cameras are having a positive effect in reducing speeds and casualties on Welsh roads.”

He said cameras can only be placed at “known accident hotspots, at sites of community concern or in roadworks – not where they will generate the most money”.

Mr Moore added: “Speeding and jumping red lights are serious offences – it’s not just about the fine or points on the licence, but driving above the speed limit can put lives at risk.”

The North Wales Road Casualty Reduction Partnership launched its Arrive Alive campaign in 2001, with 13 fixed cameras and 84 mobile sites.

A spokeswoman said: “The overall aim of the Partnership is to reduce the number of people killed and injured on the roads by using mobile and fixed safety cameras as a positive method of deterring drivers from excessive speed. Speed is still a key contributory factor to collisions in North Wales.

“As well as enforcement, our strategy also includes education, engagement and engineering.

“We endeavour to educate groups most susceptible to collisions (young drivers, motorcyclists), educate vulnerable road users (children, pedestrians), work closely with our communities to tackle antisocial driving and seek cost-effective engineering solutions.

“In 2007, the number of people killed or seriously injured on camera routes in North Wales was reduced by 63% when comparing with our baseline before Partnership enforcement took place. We are among the best performing partnerships in the UK.

“Ultimately it is the driver’s responsibility to remain within the speed limit. If drivers do not remain within these limits, they increase the risk of collision and possible injury. They also increase the risk of prosecution.

“Apart from the tragic loss of life and the immense pain road death brings to close relatives and friends, the associated economic cost of £1.6m per fatal, £160,000 per serious and £12,000 per slight injury must also be realised.”

Money made from fines is ploughed back into road safety, including paying for more cameras.

Clare Armstrong, of campaign group safespeed.org.uk, said: “This is money wasted. It’s teaching drivers nothing about road safety. Ultimately it’s a failed policy. What a horrendous thing to do to the public, to charge them so much money and not improve road safety.

“These figures are just appalling. If that money had been spent on traffic police officers on the road to stop people immediately when they speed and correct them for other things they might also have been doing, then people drive more safely.”

Taxpayers’ Alliance spokeswoman Corin Taylor branded fines a “stealth tax”.

She said: “We have seen speed camera fines rise across the UK and these figures fit within that trend.

“They are shockingly high and it shows how speed cameras are often used to make money, almost like a stealth tax, rather than deter speeding drivers. Forces are being very unimaginative.”

She added: “Forces are fixed on catching otherwise law-abiding drivers and raising a huge amount of revenue.

“It’s really not the best way to go about reducing accidents on the road.”

Sunday, August 17, 2008

Wales on Sunday: Motorists in Wales pay £10m in driving fines

by Ben Glaze, Wales On Sunday

MOTORISTS in Wales fork out a whopping £26,000 a day on speeding and red-light fines, Wales on Sunday can reveal.

Drivers spend almost £10m a year on fixed penalties – and this figure doesn’t include people stopped at the roadside or prosecuted in court.

Cash generated is ploughed back into road safety. This includes paying for extra cameras, increasing the chances of motorists getting caught.

Wales has 739 camera sites, including 159 fixed speed cameras and 538 locations where police wield radar guns. There are another 42 cameras to catch drivers running red lights. Some motorists choose not to pay the £60 conditional offer and opt to fight the charge in court. Others are hauled before magistrates because they were going so fast.

But the fixed penalties levied on 160,126 drivers across the four police force areas in 2006 alone totalled:

£3,569,460 in North Wales;

£3,118,200 in Gwent;

£2,207,880 in South Wales;

£712,020 in Dyfed Powys.

The fines work out at £26,322 a day or £1,096 an hour.

Clare Armstrong of campaign group safe- speed.org.uk said last night: “This is money wasted. It’s teaching drivers nothing about road safety.

“Ultimately it’s a failed policy. What a horrendous thing to do to the public, to charge them so much money and not improve road safety.

“These figures are just appalling. If that money had been spent on traffic police officers on the road to stop people immediately when they speed and correct them for other things they might also have been doing, then people drive more safely.”

Taxpayers’ Alliance spokeswoman Corin Taylor branded fines a “stealth tax”. He said: “We have seen speed camera fines rise across the UK and these figures fit within that trend.

“They are shockingly high and it shows how speed cameras are often used to make money, almost like a stealth tax, rather than deter speeding drivers. Forces are being very unimaginative.”

He said motorists staring at speedometers were distracted from what was happening on the road ahead. He preferred to see signs alerting drivers to their speed as they entered built-up areas.

“Forces are fixed on catching otherwise law-abiding drivers and raising a huge amount of revenue,” said Mr Taylor. “It’s really not the best way to go about reducing accidents on the road.”

Cameras in Wales are operated by two organisations. The Mid and South Wales Safety Camera Partnership is responsible for devices in the South Wales, Gwent and Dyfed Powys police force areas, including 26 mobile vans and seven bikes.

Its website says: “Neither the police nor any other partners in the safety camera scheme make any profit from speed and red light fines.

“All fines’ revenue is passed to the Treasury. The Safety Camera Partnership is funded by a grant from the Welsh Assembly Government.

“This means there is no incentive for safety camera partnerships to place cameras anywhere other than where they are needed to improve road safety. All the funding we receive is invested into making roads safer by targeting enforcement where it is needed most to reduce speeds.”

Partnership manager Jim Moore said last night: “While the focus of the statistics is revenue generated, we must not forget that safety cameras are having a positive effect in reducing speeds and casualties on Welsh roads.

He said cameras can only be placed at “known accident hotspots, at sites of community concern or in roadworks – not where they will generate the most money”.

He added: “Speeding and jumping red lights are serious offences – it’s not just about the fine or points on the licence, but driving above the speed limit can put lives at risk.”

The North Wales Road Casualty Reduction Partnership launched its Arrive Alive campaign in 2001, with 13 fixed cameras and 84 mobile sites.

A spokeswoman said: “The overall aim of the partnership is to reduce the number of people killed and injured on the roads by using mobile and fixed safety cameras as a positive method of deterring drivers from excessive speed.

“Speed is still a key contributory factor to collisions in North Wales.

“As well as enforcement, our strategy also includes education, engagement and engineering.

“We endeavour to educate groups most susceptible to collisions (young drivers, motorcyclists), educate vulnerable road users (children, pedestrians), work closely with our communities to tackle antisocial driving and seek cost-effective engineering solutions.

“In 2007, the number of people killed or seriously injured on camera routes in North Wales was reduced by 63% compared with our baseline before partnership enforcement.

“Ultimately it is the driver’s responsibility to remain within the speed limit. If drivers do not remain within these limits, they increase the risk of collision and possible injury. They also increase the risk of prosecution.”

Wednesday, August 06, 2008

Daily Star: Highway robbery

SPEEDING tickets are bringing in £200 a minute - a rate four times higher than when Labour came to power.

The huge rise in income has followed a massive expansion in the number of speed cameras on our roads.

The Home Office hs revealed that 1.8million tickets are now being issued each year, or 4,850 a day.

In 1997, only 713,000 fixed penalty notices were handed to drivers.

Cash raised has rocketed from £28.5m a decade ago to £106.4m in 2006. Tory police reform spokesman David Ruffley, who obtained the figures, accused ministers of treating motorists like "cash cows".

He said: "The number of tickets issued for speeding has increased 150% under Labour. Coupled with an increase in the basic speeding fine, this means speeding tickets are now raising over £100m a year.

"Ministers need to tell us what they are doing with this £100m a year." Matthew Elliott of the Taxpayers' Alliance said: "The law is discredited and devalued when politicians use it more as a way of making money rather than fighting crime." A Department for Transport spokesman said: "Safety cameras are there to save lives, not make money."

How YOUR county profited from speed cameras 1997 2006 Avon & Somerset £291,760 £3,156,360 Bedfordshire £348,000 £2,904,420 Cambridgeshire £593,480 £1,230,120 Cheshire £431,400 £1,714,200 Cleveland £129,560 £1,142,640 Cumbria £195,280 £1,921,380 Derbyshire £697,520 £1,887,840 Devon & Cornwall £1,446,000 £2,549,220 Dorset £446,880 £3,095,940 Durham £128,520 £169,020 Essex £1,844,920 £3,642,300 Gloucestershire £250,400 £804,360 Greater Manchester £2,195,760 £3,616,920 Hampshire £1,098,400 £2,964,240 Hertfordshire £704,160 £4,908,300 Humberside £389,400 £2,203,080 Kent £1,148,240 £2,830,740 Lancashire £952,520 £3,471,480 Leicestershire £232,480 £1,476,360 Lincolnshire £263,520 £1,545,000 City of London £20,800 £365,340 Merseyside £472,320 £1,982,400 Metropolitan £1,807,520 £6,148,920 Norfolk £192,200 £1,499,100 Northamptonshire £148,880 £2,534,520 Northumbria £1,024,120 £3,112,800 North Yorkshire £475,160 £375,480 Nottinghamshire £185,000 £2,574,960 South Yorkshire £1,562,480 £3,088,920 Staffordshire £902,080 £3,049,380 Suffolk £290,840 £2,066,520 Surrey £213,600 £2,371,200 Sussex £1,004,960 £2,881,620 Thames Valley £2,131,400 £8,238,720 Warwickshire £74,280 £1,818,960 West Mercia £615,680 £2,772,780 West Midlands £375,120 £2,669,820 West Yorkshire £964,120 £2,791,680 Wiltshire £453,200 £3,087,480 Dyfed-Powys £268,320 £63,240 Gwent £210,520 £31,860 North Wales £365,840 £3,569,460 South Wales £889,080 £1,992,480 TOTAL £28,510,120 £106,404,720

Leicester Mercury: Motorists fined £1.5 million

Cash collected each year in safety camera fines has risen by more than 500 per cent since they were introduced.

Motorists handed over nearly £1.5 million in fines in 2006, compared with £232,480 in 1997.

The figures were released by the Home Office following a request from Conservative police reform spokesman, David Ruffley.

The rise is due to an increase in the number of cameras, which operators said were helping to reduce accidents.

Revenue has also increased since the cost of fines rose from £40 to £60, in 2000.

However, the news angered some motorists.

Matthew Elliott, from pressure group TaxPayers' Alliance, said: "It's appalling that motorists, who already pay huge amounts in vehicle excise duty and petrol tax, are being stung again by the aggressive growth of the speed camera industry."

When speed cameras were introduced in 1997, there were five in the county and one in the city.

There are now eight in the city and 11 in the county, plus 86 mobile cameras across Leicestershire and Rutland.

There are 11 cameras which capture drivers who go through red lights.

However, since 2000, the number of deaths on the roads of Leicestershire and Rutland has held steady, at an average of 65 per year.

Rob Davies, 43, from Husbands Bosworth, said: "The cameras are nothing but an indirect tax on drivers. They put them on roads that are not dangerous."

HGV driver Mark Curtis, 47, from Aylestone, Leicester, said: "Speed cameras are a good idea in accident blackspots, but I also think they are used to target drivers in areas where there is no need to have them."

Hema Lad, of Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland Safety Camera Scheme, run by police and councils, said: "We do not want to fine motorists as we do not benefit from them being caught.

"We benefit from casualties going down and, ultimately, these cameras are all about safety."

Money from fines goes to the Treasury and can be passed back to local authorities in the form of road safety grants.

There are no figures yet for 2007, though £3.3 million was collected in fines in Leicestershire between October 2006 and September 2007.

Tuesday, August 05, 2008

Daily Mail: Highway robbery: How speeding fines have quadrupled to £200 a MINUTE under Labour

By James Slack

Revenue from speeding tickets has almost quadrupled to £200 a minute since Labour came to power.

The increase has coincided with a massive expansion in the number of speed cameras

Home Office figures reveal that 1.8million tickets are being issued each year, or 4,850 a day. In 1997, only 713,000 fixed penalty notices were handed to drivers.

This is an increase of 150 per cent in only a decade, and it has been compounded by an increase in the value of fines - from £40 to £ 60 - in 2000.

As a result, the total amount of cash raised has rocketed from £28.5million a decade ago to £106.4million in 2006, the period covered by the latest figures.

Tory police reform spokesman David Ruffley, who obtained the data, accused ministers of treating motorists like 'cash cows'.

Mr Ruffley said: 'The number of tickets issued for speeding has increased 150 per cent under Labour.

'Coupled with an increase in the basic speeding fine, this means speeding tickets are now raising over £100 million a year for the Government.

'Ministers need to tell us what they are doing with this £100million a year taken from motorists.

'How much is actually put back into practical road safety that does not involve speed cameras?

'Ministers' failure to answer that question confirms the view that for this Government the British motorist is "a nice little earner".

'Is Labour using speeding tickets just to raise revenue rather than making our roads safer?

'Using speed cameras as a cash cow undermines public confidence. The Government needs to rethink ways of improving road safety, including cracking down on uninsured drivers.

The huge hike in the number of motorists being trapped is a direct result of an increase in the number of cameras. Britain is officially the speed camera capital of Europe.

There are 5,562 roadside speed cameras, compared with 1,935 as recently as 2000. Over the same period, mobile speed traps have increased from just 173 to 2,373.

Following a recent Government U-turn, speed-camera partnerships - comprising councils, police and the courts - no longer receive a penny from cameras.

Instead, the millions generated go directly into Treasury coffers. The Government then makes road safety grants to local councils.

The figures will stoke controversy at a time when Labour is seeking to clobber 13million motorists with up to £2billion in green vehicle excise duty (VED) taxes.

The changes, which apply to more-polluting cars purchased since 2001, will increase some road tax bills from £210 to £430.

Matthew Elliott of the TaxPayers' Alliance said: 'It's appalling that motorists who already pay huge amounts in VED and petrol tax are being stung yet again by the aggressive growth of the speed camera industry.

'The law is discredited and devalued when politicians use it more as a way of making money rather than fighting crime.'

Over the ten-year period since Labour won power, there were increases in the number of speeding fines in 40 out of the 43 police forces in England and Wales.

In Nottinghamshire, there has been a nine-fold increase, from 4,625 fines in 1997 to 42,916 fines in 2006. In Warwickshire, the number has increased 16-fold, from 1,857 fines in 1997 to 30,316 in 2006.

Mr Ruffley's probing of the first ten years of Labour rule also shows the number of fines for speeding imposed by magistrates increased by 16 per cent - from 130,605 in 1997 to 152,461 in 2006.

These fines are up to £1,000 each, raising millions more in revenue.

But separate figures seen by the Daily Mail show there were fewer prosecutions last year in two of the main categories which worry the public.

Dangerous driving cases fell by 1,100 to 7,400 and prosecutions for driving while drunk or on drugs were down from 103,500 to 101,400.

Despite the huge increase in speeding fines, Britain's record for reducing accidents is much worse than other countries.

The European Transport Safety Council says that between 2001 and 2005 there was a mere seven per cent reduction in the number of road deaths in Britain compared with a 25 per cent drop in Sweden and the Netherlands and 35 per cent in France.

Experts warn that too much emphasis is now placed on using cameras to trap motorists, at the expense of old-fashioned policing by officers in cars.

A Department for Transport spokesman said: 'Safety cameras are there to save lives, not make money.

'Independent research shows there are 1,745 fewer deaths and serious injuries at camera sites each year.'

He added that some of the revenue came from police-issued tickets, not cameras.

Monday, August 04, 2008

Daily Express: Labour's latest stealth tax hits 11.7m drivers

By Jason Groves, Political Editor

THERE is more grim news for motorists as Labour’s latest stealth tax will hit 11.7 million drivers, it was revealed last night.

The figures show increases in vehicle excise duty of up to £245 next year, when Gordon Brown’s “green” measures are brought in.

The estimate is almost 25 per cent higher than the Treasury’s prediction of 9.4 million motorists.

Increases could also raise a “far larger” sum than previously thought, about  £1.6billion a year by 2010, more than double the £735million predicted by Chancellor Alistair Darling.

Last night the figures, released to a parliamentary inquiry, led to claims the public had been duped.

TaxPayers’ Alliance spokesman Matthew Elliott said:  “It’s clear the Government have misled everyone about how many people will feel the pinch of these changes.

“For all the green rhetoric, this has always been about squeezing as much money out of people as possible, which is a heartless way to behave in such tough economic conditions. 

“These changes are far more greedy than green.”

Philip Hammond, shadow chief secretary to the Treasury, said the figures would increase pressure on ministers to scrap the changes.

He said: “This report will add to the mounting pressure on Gordon Brown to reverse this disastrous tax increase on the poorest.”

Mr Darling claims the new VED bands will  persuade motorists to choose cars with lower carbon emissions which qualify for lower tax rates.

He has been widely criticised, however, for applying the tax retrospectively to all cars bought since 2001, rather than just new models, raising suspicions that the move is mainly designed to raise revenue.

Family cars such as the Ford Mondeo and Vauxhall Zafira are among vehicles that will be charged more, according to the report by the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders.

It is now seeking urgent talks with the Treasury.

A spokesman for the group said backdating the tax could have “perverse consequences” by forcing people to hang on to older, less green cars, because they could no longer sell them second-hand.

He added: “These measures will  substantially increase the cost of motoring when drivers are already struggling with high fuel costs.”

Ministers expect more pressure tomorrow when the influential Commons environmental audit committee publishes its own inquiry. It is expected to question whether raising road tax on older cars will reduce carbon emissions.

A Treasury spokesman last night defended the policy and insisted that the majority of drivers would be better off under the new bands.

Friday, August 01, 2008

Telegraph.co.uk: Charge drivers more to go to the shops, minister tells local councils

By Christopher Hope, Home Affairs Editor

Motorists should be charged more to drive into town centres and park there, a Government minister has told town hall bosses.

Local Government minister John Healy said in a speech to council chiefs that not enough of them were charging for local services.

He said: "Only one in five councils are using charging to the full potential. Not just to cover costs but to shape their area."

In a clear sign that he believes motorists should be targeted, Mr Healy said that charging more would result in "reducing congestion, improving levels of health and exercise, encouraging the use of local shops".

The Tories said that the suggestion of charging for more car journeys was outrageous given the large increases in council tax over the past decade.

Figures from the TaxPayers' Alliance show that council fees for local services more than doubled in a decade from £5.5billion in 1997/98 to £12.6billion in 2007/8.

Other statistics from the Department for Communities and Local Government show that the amount of money made by councils from parking charges has jumped by 14 per cent in the past two years.

Mr Healy revealed in the speech at the Local Government Association conference in Bournemouth that the Government was considering "new funding tools" for local authorities.

He said: "When I debate the economic role of local Government, I always hear the argument for more freedoms and financial powers.

"I'm always receptive. And I'm looking at new funding tools at the moment."

He added: "Half of councils don't even have a clear policy on charging to guide their decisions on how to use their powers."

Whitehall sources said that the most obvious areas to increase charging were in parking fees, leisure centre prices, introducing congestion charging or other fees such as those of planning applications.

Mr Healy's demand that councils charge more for local services comes despite double digit rises in council tax since Labour came to power 10 years ago.

Analysis by the GMB union also shows that more than £700million of council tax is uncollected every year by councils across Britain.

Eric Pickles, the Tories' Local Government spokesman, said Labour was intent on "clobbering the public with another Gordon Brown stealth tax".

He said: "It is shocking that Whitehall is pressing councils to use parking charges as a cash cow to raid the pockets of public.

"You would have thought the excessive rises over the past decade in council tax would be enough.

"Ministers are calling on councils to use to squeeze more money out of the public who are already struggling with the spiralling cost of living."

Matthew Elliott, chief executive of the TaxPayers' Alliance, added: "The last thing taxpayers need is even more stealth taxes and charges.

"It's outrageous that Government ministers are going round in public claiming to understand the financial pressures people are under, but behind closed doors they are urging councils to squeeze everyone for even more money.

"Councils already raise far too much by charging for things that used to be included in return for council tax."

However, local authorities leaders defended the need for more charging for local services.

Sir Simon Milton, chairman of the Local Government Association, said: "Local councils have to make tough choices between spending cuts, council tax rises and charging fees.

"In certain parts of the country the money councils have received from central government will make it the worst settlement for a decade.

"That different councils have different charging policies should come as no surprise. Every area has its own unique issues and councils will rightly adopt charging policies to local circumstances.

"Charges and fees would be better exercised through a buoyant, open and progressive local tax system, but under the current system, councils are doing the best they can to put people first with the tools they've got."

Thursday, July 24, 2008

Daily Telegraph: Thirteen million drivers to pay higher road taxes

By Robert Winnett, Deputy Political Editor

More than half of Britain's 26.6 million drivers will receive higher bills with owners of many popular family saloons seeing their bills double.

The latest figures apparently contradict assurances given by Gordon Brown, Alistair Darling and other ministers that the majority of drivers will be "better off or no worse off" following the controversial changes to reform vehicle excise duty (VED).

The statistics were slipped out by the Treasury in answers to Parliamentary questions as MPs left for their 11-week summer break sparking allegations that the Government was trying to hide bad news.

The Conservatives accused ministers of misleading the public over the impact of the proposed changes.

Justine Greening, the shadow Treasury minister, said: "The Treasury have now been exposed for deliberately covering up the truth of their road tax hike - that the majority of motorists will be hit paying more road tax next year.

"These rises are retrospective for many drivers and will have virtually no impact on emissions. Gordon Brown is clobbering hard pressed families for more road tax when they can least afford it. When will Mr Brown ever give families a break?"

The figures reveal that 5.687 million people who own cars bought before 2001 will see their road tax increase by £15 to £200. The rise applies to anyone with an older vehicle with an engine above 1,550 cc.

For cars bought after 2001, the current system of seven levels of VED will be replaced with a new system of thirteen different bands. The bands are based on a vehicle's carbon dioxide emissions.

More than 7.93 million owners of newer cars will also pay more. The biggest increases will be for people who bought cars between 2001 and 2006 who could see their tax increase from £210 or less to more than £400 by 2010.

The figures reveal that 3.964 million people will pay the same road tax next year and just over nine million drivers with greener vehicles will receive reduced bills.

The Prime Minister and Chancellor are now under intense pressure from Labour MPs to water down the proposed changes.

The Telegraph has also been campaigning for the Government to abandon the plans.

More than 50 Labour MPs are threatening to vote against the plans and Mr Brown, who was damaged by the row over the abolition of the 10p income tax band, is understood to have privately indicated that he is prepared to back down on some of the changes.

Mr Brown is thought to believe that although the general thrust of the tax changes to reward greener cars is correct some of the detail of the proposals could be renegotiated. The Government has already agreed to postpone a two pence rise in fuel duty which was due to be introduced in the autumn.

Matthew Elliott, Chief Executive of the TaxPayers' Alliance, said: "From the outset this has been a cynical tax grab that is more greedy than green. The proposals are another body blow for families already struggling under the weight of high fuel prices and record tax bills."

The AA is now calling on the Government to be more open about the impact of the proposed changes and for the Treasury to publish full details of which vehicles will pay more on its website.

Edmund King, the President of the AA, said last night: "We have said to the Treasury at the very highest levels that there is so much confusion and mis-information about these changes that they should just publish all the information in plain English. It is still incredibly difficult to work out the implications and we need much greater transparency."

The Treasury insists that it has not misled the public and that cars bought before 2001 are not included in the reform package which ministers are referring to when claiming most motorists are not worse off.

A spokesman said: "As we have made clear, pre-2001 cars are not included in the reforms. We set out the position very clearly in the Budget, and have repeatedly said that under the new VED bands a majority of motorists will either pay less or the same in real terms.

"Rates for pre-2001 cars will continue to be based on engine size."

Friday, July 18, 2008

Evening Standard: Letters: Poor families hit by car tax changes

Taxes already make up two-thirds of the astronomical price of petrol, so it is good news that fuel duty will be frozen this year. However, the Chancellor must also have the courage to abandon changes to the Vehicle Excise Duty regime or the increase in people's road tax bills over the next couple of years will make a Fuel Duty reprieve feel rather hollow.

These new taxes don't just target "gas-guzzlers". Our research reveals that Nissan Micras will face a bigger percentage increase in their road tax than Hummers. Many other models will face big tax increases due to the change in the banding system.

It is particularly unfair on poorer families with older cars who face increases in their bills they couldn't have foreseen when they bought the car. Is this an kick in the face of the ordinary people of the UK on a par with the abolition of the 10p tax band?

Corin Taylor
Campaign Director,
The TaxPayers' Alliance

Thursday, July 17, 2008

Telegraph.co.uk: Motorists face £5 charge to beat jams on motorway hard shoulder

By Rosa Prince, Political Correspondent

Motorists could pay up to £5 to avoid jams by using the motorway hard shoulder in traffic black spots, under new proposals.

Ruth Kelly, the Transport Secretary, announced that "hard shoulder running" would be rolled out on a cluster of the country's busiest motorways following the success of trials in the West Midlands.

Mrs Kelly confirmed that ministers are now looking into the practicality of turning the extra lane created though the use of the hard shoulder on at least four motorways into dedicated toll lanes, similar to those used in congested areas in the United States.

Other options include using the lane for car-sharing vehicles, only charging drivers who are not carrying passengers, or turning it into a crawler lane for lorries and caravans.

The announcement came as part of a £6 billion package designed to tackle congestion on the busiest motorways and in urban centres.

It followed the decision by Alistair Darling, the Chancellor, to postpone the 2p increase in fuel duty, which was due to come in this October.

Hard shoulder running will now be introduced on 500 miles of motorway, including the M3 and M4 coming into London, the M4 and M5 around Bristol, and the M3 and M27 approaching Southampton.

Although the likely fee for the toll lane has not been set, sources suggested it would be in the region of £5, which would be levied during peak hours, rather than round the clock.
In the US, toll lanes are known as "Lexus lanes," because they tend to be used by wealthy drivers of large cars.

Mrs Kelly said: "I am determined to get the best from our road network so that motorists have reliable journey times on roads that are safe and well-managed.

"The greatest barrier to this is congestion. It is frustrating and has serious consequences for the economy and the environment.

"The £6 billion I am announcing will allow us to develop and implement more innovative approaches to the way we use our major roads.

"Where we add new capacity through measures like this, I am also interested to see what role car-share or tolled lanes could play in helping traffic flow more smoothly - giving motorists a choice about how they make their journeys."

The Transport Secretary also set out plans for a massive programme of lane widening, trunk road upgrading and junction improvements across the country, as well as a new fund to tackle congestion in city centres.

Councils in Bristol, Greater Manchester, Leicester, London, Merseyside, South Yorkshire, Tyne and Wear and the West Midlands will be able to draw from a £60 million Urban Congestion Performance Fund, with ministers holding out the prospect of local congestion charging in these areas.

Motoring groups welcomed the package but called for more improvements to the road network.

Edmund King, president of the AA, said: "Hard shoulder running is not a panacea for all our motorway congestion problems and we still believe that some motorways should be widened as this brings greater capacity and safety benefits.

"There was also a broad welcome for the postponement of the 2p rise in fuel duty, which follows a Daily Telegraph campaign for a fair deal for drivers.

"Mark Wallace, of the TaxPayers' Alliance, said: "Millions of motorists are struggling to keep their cars on the road even for essential tasks like commuting or food shopping, so this is a welcome decision by the Chancellor."

Daily Express: 2p off petrol tax: it's a farce

By Macer Hall, Political Editor

GORDON Brown was accused last night of trying to pull off yet another confidence trick on tax after delaying a 2p rise in fuel duty.

In a long-expected move, the Government announced that the tax increase on a litre of petrol or diesel due this autumn will be cancelled.

But it did nothing to quell drivers’ anger. Motoring organisations immediately branded the gesture an inadequate “drop in the ocean” and demanded a complete end to rip-off Treasury tax windfalls from spiralling oil prices. 

Opposition parties claimed that the announcement – after massive pressure from a Daily Express crusade – was just a cynical ploy designed to save Gordon Brown’s ailing premiership.

Tories branded the move “a short-term political fix” and a “cynical political calculation”. Shadow Treasury Minister David Gauke said: “This is another tax con by the Prime Minister. Independent research shows that the Treasury is raking in the cash from oil price rises. Cancelling the 2p fuel duty rise will do nothing to stop that.

“Mr Brown claims he is trying to help motorists but he doesn’t mention that around 66p on every litre in fuel goes to the Treasury.”

Shadow Treasury Chief Secretary Philip Hammond added: “This climbdown is not a triumph for democracy, but a triumph for cynical short-term political calculation.”

Mr Brown’s retreat over fuel duty follows a crusade by the Daily Express for a substantial reduction in tax on petrol and diesel.

Earlier this month, the Daily Express delivered 100,000 crusade coupons signed by readers to No10 Downing Street. Just a day later, the Prime Minister dropped a big hint of his plans to delay the rise.

However, research has shown that a far more radical cut of 14p a litre could be supported by the Treasury’s windfall from North Sea oil tax revenue – and the Daily Express crusade will continue despite yesterday’s partial climbdown.

Chancellor Alistair Darling announced the gesture shortly before embattled Mr Brown was due to appear at his last Prime Minister’s Questions clash ahead of Parliament’s 11-week break.

The PM is understood to have been desperate for an upbeat performance in an attempt to stave off Labour plots against him over the summer. His aides were concerned that a hammering in next week’s Glasgow East by-election could force him out.

But with inflation hitting a 16-year high of 3.8 per cent and a tank of petrol already costing £20 more than a year ago, hauliers, motoring groups and business leaders reacted with disappointment to the duty freeze. 

They pointed out that motoring taxes and Vehicle Excise Duty changes in the last Budget will still raise £2billion this year.

Independent financial experts estimate that the Treasury will rake in an extra £1billion in tax this year on North Sea oil profits.

Geoff Dossetter, of the Freight Transport Association, said: “At 50p a litre, diesel duty is twice the EU average.

“Given that almost everything we consume is the product of a lorry journey, then higher fuel prices contribute to price rises for everything we buy.” The RAC said: “We’d like to see the Chancellor not just postpone future rises, but actually cut fuel duty.”

Spokeswoman Sheila Rainger said: “The Chancellor has pulled a populist rabbit out of the hat, but this is a drop in the ocean compared to the extra billions that the Treasury intends to take from the motorist over the next two years.

“The Government must carry out an urgent root-and-branch review of motoring taxes.”

Mark Wallace, of the TaxPayers’ Alliance, said: “People need urgent action to reduce fuel duty further. Tax cuts are essential.”

Friday, July 11, 2008

Liverpool Daily Post: WALES: Road tax anger grows

MOTORING and taxpayers' groups reacted angrily yesterday as it became known just how much extra many drivers will have to find to pay for road tax changes.

The Government has admitted some 43% of road users will see their bills rise by up to pounds 245 by April 2010, compared with fewer than a fifth who will be better off in real terms.

Treasury Minister Angela Eagle said that overall in 2009/10, "a third of cars will be better off in real terms and, in total, approximately 55% of cars will be no worse off". Just over 44% will pay more.

By 2010/11, 9.4 million face higher bills - 43% of the predicted number of vehicles on the road.

Some 8.4m will fork out around the same, while 1.4m are set to benefit financially.

Experts calculate the Exchequer will have received more than pounds 1b in extra vehicle excise duty (VED) revenue by 2011.

The AA said the figures "confirm our worst fears", while shadow chancellor George Osborne accused Prime Minister Gordon Brown of misleading Parliament over the car tax information.

The Liberal Democrats said the Government must have "a death wish", while RAC Foundation said it was "shocking".

The TaxPayers' Alliance said the VED rates were "a cynical tax grab" but Friends of the Earth said the Government should "stand firm.

Ms Eagle insisted there had been no effort to hide the reforms.

She said: "It is a pretty bad stealth tax, I would say, given all the publicity that is about."

Currently, the maximum road tax for a vehicle registered between March 2001 and March 2006 is pounds 210.

However, from April 2010 that will increase to pounds 455 for the heaviest polluters.

The Herald: Road tax rise last straw for poor families, claim Tories

MICHAEL SETTLE UK POLITICAL EDITOR

Gordon Brown was last night accused of "bleeding low income families dry" after it emerged that 9.4 million motorists will have to pay more under the UK Government's road tax shake-up.

The charge came from the Conservatives, who warned the Prime Minister that his administration was "sleepwalking into another 10p tax fiasco". The row erupted after the estimates, showing just how much people will have to pay under the Vehicle Excise Duty (VED) changes, were released in a Commons parliamentary answer.

The UK Government admitted that, by April 2010, 43per cent of road users would see their bills rise by up to £245 compared with fewer than one-fifth who would be better off in real terms.

In terms of numbers of motorists, this will mean 9.4 million face higher bills, 8.4 million will pay roughly the same as now while 1.4 million will benefit. Experts calculate that by 2011 the Treasury will receive more than £1bn in extra VED.

Last night, the Tories said their analysis showed that, of the 9.4 million losers, 400,000 would be families earning less than £15,000 a year. They also noted that the low-paid would face paying the top £245 yearly increase - equivalent to more than a week's take-home pay - while an average family would pay £80 more by 2010-11.

Justine Greening, the Shadow Economic Secretary, said: "How does Gordon Brown expect those earning less than £15,000 a year to suddenly find £245, much less the thousands of pounds it would cost to buy a new, lower emission car? This government is bleeding low income families dry, just as they are most under pressure from rises in the cost of living."

Norman Baker for the Liberal Democrats was equally critical, saying: "This government must have a death wish. It is wrong in principle to tax behaviour retrospectively. Green taxes should be about influencing behaviour not penalising decisions made up to seven years ago."

Elsewhere, the AA said the new figures "confirm our worst fears" while the TaxPayers' Alliance claimed the VED rates were "a cynical tax grab".

However, Angela Eagle, the Treasury Minister, insisted that experts believed that in 2009-10 one-third of cars would be better off in real terms while "approximately 55per cent of cars will be no worse off". She insisted there had been no effort to hide the reforms, saying: "It is a pretty bad stealth tax, I would say, given all the publicity that is about."

The government received support from green campaigners with Friends of the Earth arguing that increasing VED on older gas-guzzlers would encourage people to choose greener cars, cut fuel bills and help reduce CO 2. "Ministers must stand firm on their VED plans and do more to encourage greener travel, " it said.

Currently, the maximum road tax for a vehicle registered between March 2001 and March 2006 is £210. From April 2010, this will increase to £455 for the heaviest polluters.

Vehicles such as Range Rovers and some people carriers emitting more than 255g of CO 2 per kilometre will pay up to £440. Cars with smaller engines face a £100 rise.

In the Commons, George Osborne, the Shadow Chancellor, accused Mr Brown of misleading MPs over the road tax changes. "He said that the majority of drivers would benefit from the changes to VED. Now even the Treasury have admitted that just a third of drivers will be better off in 2009, dropping to less than 20per cent in 2010. This destroys the government's defence that this is a green tax."

David Cameron, the Tory leader, called on the PM to "correct himself and apologise". Later, however, the PM's spokesman denied Mr Brown had misled MPs. While on June 4, the Prime Minister had said most drivers would benefit from the VED changes, the spokesman pointed to remarks he made a month earlier, saying: "The Prime Minister made the position clear on May 14 and that is the language that has been used consistently."

Nearly 50 Labour back benchers signed an amendment to the Finance Bill asking ministers to rethink their VED plans but the government managed to avert a rebellion in the Commons because it held out hope of possible changes in the Chancellor's autumn pre-Budget report.

Last night, Ronnie Campbell, one of the leading Labour rebels, referred to Alistair Darling's "commitment" to look again at the VED changes in the October statement.

"We're flexing our muscles and saying: 'Come on, be careful here. You're going to tax these people, they're workingclass people, they're our core vote, ' " said Mr Campbell.

Elsewhere at Westminster, much merriment was had by the Conservatives over Mr Brown's comparison to Heathcliff, the disturbed anti-hero in Emily Bronte's Wuthering Heights. Mr Osborne suggested given the PM's record it should be "dithering heights" while Mr Cameron sparked chuckles in the chamber by welcoming Mr Brown back from the G8 summit with the words: "Heathcliff has come home."

In a separate development, reports that Mr Darling had twice offered to resign because of the PM ordering rewrites of the Budget were put to Mr Brown's spokesman, who said: "I have no information on that."

Newcastle Journal: Increased Road Tax Sparks Fury

MOTORING and taxpayer groups reacted with anger today as it became known just how much extra drivers will have to find to pay for road tax changes.

The Government has admitted some 43% of road users will see their bills rise by up to £245 by April 2010, with only a fifth better off in real terms.

Treasury Minister Angela Eagle said that overall "a third of cars will be better off in real terms and, in total, approximately 55% will be no worse off". Just over 44% will pay more.

By 2010/11, 9.4 million face higher bills 43% of the predicted number of vehicles on the road.

Some 8.4 million will fork out around the same, while 1.4 million are set to benefit financially.

Experts calculate that the Exchequer will have received more than £1bn in extra vehicle excise duty revenue by 2011.

The AA said the figures "confirm our worst fears", while shadow chancellor George Osborne accused Prime Minister Gordon Brown
of misleading Parliament over the car tax information.

The Liberal Democrats said the Government must have "a death wish", while RAC Foundation said it was "shocking" that the Treasury had taken so long to acknowledge the full impact of the changes, first announced in the last Budget.

The TaxPayers' Alliance said the VED rates were "a cynical tax grab" but Friends of the Earth said the Government should "stand firm" over its car tax plans.

Ms Eagle insisted there had been no effort to hide the reforms. She said: "It is a pretty bad stealth tax, I would say, given all the publicity that is about."

Mr Osborne said: "Gordon Brown appears to have misled Parliament. He said that the majority of drivers would benefit from the changes to VED. Now even the Treasury have admitted that just a third of drivers will be better off in 2009, dropping to less than 20% in 2010.

"We need the Prime Minister to tell us whether he knew that he was giving Parliament the wrong information and was treating the public like fools, or was it the case that he didn't know the truth about the impact of his own Budget on families?"

AA president Edmund King said: "The Treasury has made a mistake and must now scrap the retrospective' nature of the tax disc changes for older vehicles. This is not a green tax but a mean tax."

A spokesman dismissed suggestions that Mr Brown had misled the House of Commons over the issue.

On June 4 Mr Brown told MPs that the majority of drivers would benefit from the changes.

However, the spokesman pointed to early comments on May 14 when Mr Brown told the Commons that "the majority of motorists will benefit or pay no more".

The Sun: Road tax rage

By DAVID WOODING

THE PM was accused yesterday of misleading motorists over crippling car tax hikes.

Gordon Brown faced a backlash from drivers as it emerged nine million will be up to £245 worse off.

The AA said the figures “confirm our worst fears”.

Shadow Chancellor George Osborne said: “Gordon Brown appears to have misled Parliament. Will the Prime Minister be apologising to this House?”

The Lib Dems said Labour had “a death wish” and the RAC Foundation was “shocked” the Treasury had taken so long to admit the impact of the changes – revealed in the last Budget.

The TaxPayers’ Alliance called the rates “a cynical tax grab”. And 50 Labour MPs signed a motion calling for a U-turn, fearing they will be punished at the next election.

Tory leader David Cameron asked the PM: “Will you admit, when you told me from the despatch box that a majority of drivers would benefit, you were wrong?” Mr Brown didn’t.

New figures show nearly half of car-owners will be worse off and less than one in five better off.

Defiant Mr Brown insisted: “Our policy is fair to people with the least polluting cars.”

But Mr Osborne said: “Nine million families face higher car taxes when few can afford it.”

Chancellor Alistair Darling will examine the new banded system in his October pre-Budget report, but said it was vital to urge car manufacturers to make ‘greener’ cars.

New figures show 400,000 car owners facing higher bills earn less than £15,000 a year.

Poorer families will need a week’s pay to meet the hike.

Below we show how the rises will hit typical family cars.

Blackpool Gazette: Motorists suffer green tax misery

By Joe Robinson
MOTORISTS are set for further misery with millions set to suffer road tax rises of up to £245.
The admission by the Treasury piles more agony on for drivers who are already having to bear the cost of rocketing fuel prices.

Government officials yesterday admitted the changes meant 43 per cent, around 9.4m drivers, will see increases by April 2010.

Experts claim the hikes will mean that the Government will receive more than £1bn more in vehicle excise duty (VED) revenue by 2011.

The rises also include retrospective charges for older vehicles which are said to be pollutants.

Around 18 per cent of drivers will, however, see price decreases.

AA president Edmund King slammed the rises saying the charges which he said would hit poorer families worst.

He said: "The Treasury has made a mistake and must now scrap the 'retrospective' nature of the tax disc changes for older vehicles.

"This is not a green tax but a mean tax that will hit millions of hard-up families.

"Coupled with the record pump prices, this will bring double misery to millions of motorists."

The road tax rises have been in the pipeline for some time, but the full extent of their impact has just been revealed.

Matthew Elliott, chief executive at the TaxPayers' Alliance, added: "This is a cynical tax grab that will hit millions of families hard."

Blackpool Hackney carriage driver Steve Buckley also said the rises were confusing.

"They (the Government) seem to be making it up as they go along," he complained.

"It's a hard time for motorists and this sounds like it's just going to make things worse.

"Taxis used to get discounts on their road tax but now I'm paying the same as on my car – a Renault Scenic."

Friends of the Earth, however, praised the rises and said that the Government should stand firm. Simon Bullock from the green charity said: "Upping VED on old, very polluting cars will encourage people to choose greener vehicles, cut fuel bills and lower carbon dioxide emissions.

"Ministers must stand firm on their VED plans and do more to encourage greener travel.''

Glasgow Herald: Road tax rise last straw for poor families, claim Tories

Gordon Brown was last night accused of "bleeding low income families dry" after it emerged that 9.4 million motorists will have to pay more under the UK Government's road tax shake-up.

The charge came from the Conservatives, who warned the Prime Minister that his administration was "sleepwalking into another 10p tax fiasco". The row erupted after the estimates, showing just how much people will have to pay under the Vehicle Excise Duty (VED) changes, were released in a Commons parliamentary answer.

The UK Government admitted that, by April 2010, 43% of road users would see their bills rise by up to £245 compared with fewer than one-fifth who would be better off in real terms.

In terms of numbers of motorists, this will mean 9.4 million face higher bills, 8.4 million will pay roughly the same as now while 1.4 million will benefit. Experts calculate that by 2011 the Treasury will receive more than £1bn in extra VED.

Last night, the Tories said their analysis showed that, of the 9.4 million losers, 400,000 would be families earning less than £15,000 a year. They also noted that the low-paid would face paying the top £245 yearly increase - equivalent to more than a week's take-home pay - while an average family would pay £80 more by 2010-11.

Justine Greening, the Shadow Economic Secretary, said: "How does Gordon Brown expect those earning less than £15,000 a year to suddenly find £245, much less the thousands of pounds it would cost to buy a new, lower emission car? This government is bleeding low income families dry, just as they are most under pressure from rises in the cost of living."

Norman Baker for the Liberal Democrats was equally critical, saying: "This government must have a death wish. It is wrong in principle to tax behaviour retrospectively. Green taxes should be about influencing behaviour not penalising decisions made up to seven years ago."

Elsewhere, the AA said the new figures "confirm our worst fears" while the TaxPayers' Alliance claimed the VED rates were "a cynical tax grab".

However, Angela Eagle, the Treasury Minister, insisted that experts believed that in 2009-10 one-third of cars would be better off in real terms while "approximately 55% of cars will be no worse off". She insisted there had been no effort to hide the reforms, saying: "It is a pretty bad stealth tax, I would say, given all the publicity that is about."

The government received support from green campaigners with Friends of the Earth arguing that increasing VED on older gas-guzzlers would encourage people to choose greener cars, cut fuel bills and help reduce CO2. "Ministers must stand firm on their VED plans and do more to encourage greener travel," it said.

Currently, the maximum road tax for a vehicle registered between March 2001 and March 2006 is £210. From April 2010, this will increase to £455 for the heaviest polluters.

Vehicles such as Range Rovers and some people carriers emitting more than 255g of CO2 per kilometre will pay up to £440. Cars with smaller engines face a £100 rise.

In the Commons, George Osborne, the Shadow Chancellor, accused Mr Brown of misleading MPs over the road tax changes. "He said that the majority of drivers would benefit from the changes to VED. Now even the Treasury have admitted that just a third of drivers will be better off in 2009, dropping to less than 20% in 2010. This destroys the government's defence that this is a green tax."

David Cameron, the Tory leader, called on the PM to "correct himself and apologise". Later, however, the PM's spokesman denied Mr Brown had misled MPs. While on June 4, the Prime Minister had said most drivers would benefit from the VED changes, the spokesman pointed to remarks he made a month earlier, saying: "The Prime Minister made the position clear on May 14 and that is the language that has been used consistently."

Nearly 50 Labour back benchers signed an amendment to the Finance Bill asking ministers to rethink their VED plans but the government managed to avert a rebellion in the Commons because it held out hope of possible changes in the Chancellor's autumn pre-Budget report.

Last night, Ronnie Campbell, one of the leading Labour rebels, referred to Alistair Darling's "commitment" to look again at the VED changes in the October statement.

"We're flexing our muscles and saying: Come on, be careful here. You're going to tax these people, they're working-class people, they're our core vote,' " said Mr Campbell.

Elsewhere at Westminster, much merriment was had by the Conservatives over Mr Brown's comparison to Heathcliff, the disturbed anti-hero in Emily Bronte's Wuthering Heights. Mr Osborne suggested given the PM's record it should be "dithering heights" while Mr Cameron sparked chuckles in the chamber by welcoming Mr Brown back from the G8 summit with the words: "Heathcliff has come home."

In a separate development, reports that Mr Darling had twice offered to resign because of the PM ordering rewrites of the Budget were put to Mr Brown's spokesman, who said: "I have no information on that."

Thursday, July 10, 2008

Finance Markets: New car tax to hit nearly 10 million people

by Brian Turner

The government has admitted that the new car tax rules, which aims to increase tax on cars according to carbon dioxide emissions, will create higher tax bills for as many as 9.4 million.

The change is expected to raise around £1 billion in tax revenues by 2011.

It comes at a time when motorists are already reeling at record fuel bills, new car sales are down, and ordinary people are feel the squeeze on their personal finances due to the Credit Crunch.

While government spin doctors claim that money raised through higher road taxes tackles environmental issues, revenues collected through “green taxation” are not directly ploughed back into environmental projects, but instead simply added to general revenues for the exchequer.

According to the Taxpayers Alliance (TPA), money raised through green taxes is at least more than double that actually spent on tackling carbon emissions, so the primary role of green taxation ends up simply as general revenue generation.

Despite ten years of booming economic conditions, the government has relatively little in cash reserves. This means they now have to find other ways to increase taxes to help pay for public spending programs, as well as pay for American wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

In the meantime, motorists have been flocking to the Vehicle Certification Agency calculators at the VCA Car Fuel Data site to determine how they will be affected. The volume of internet traffic crashed the website earlier today.

4ni.co.uk: Road Users Face Car Tax Hike

Motorists are facing road tax increases of up to £245, the Government has announced.

The Treasury said on Wednesday that almost half of all drivers - about nine million - will be hit with significant rises in Vehicle Excise Duty (VED) on cars with larger engines.

Treasury Minister Angela Eagle said that overall in 2009/10 a third of cars will be better off and approximately 55% of cars will be no worse off.

However, by 2010/11, 9.4 million or 43% of road users will face higher bills, while 1.4 million are set to benefit financially.

Ms Eagle said that owners of five of the UK's most popular cars will pay more - the 2.2l diesel Land Rover Freelander, the 1.6l unleaded Toyota Auris, the 2.2l diesel Honda CR-V, the 1.8l unleaded Vauxhall Vectra and the 1.6l unleaded Vauxhall Zafira.

Analysts have calculated that the Exchequer will have netted more than £1 billion in extra vehicle duty (VED) revenue by 2011.

The AA say the figures confirm their worst fears and shadow chancellor George Osborne has accused Prime Minister Gordon Brown of "misleading Parliament over the car tax information".

Downing Street has rejected that suggestion and has said the aim is to cut carbon emissions.

Liberal Democrat Shadow Transport Secretary, Norman Baker said: "Tougher emissions targets are clearly to be welcomed, but without real action to meet them they will be meaningless.

"The UK's poor performance so far suggests that we will miss even the EU's lower 2012 emissions target, let alone these tougher targets.

"Without more commitment from the Government today's announcement is just a load of hot air."

The current European Commission target is to reduce carbon emissions from new cars to 130g/kg by 2012. However, Mr Baker has pointed out that the current average emissions for new British cars is 165g/kg, and only reduced by 1.4% last year.

The higher tax estimates, which have been revealed by Ms Eagle in a Parliamentary answer have sparked another row over road tax changes, which have attracted criticism from the Labour camp.

Shadow Chancellor George Osborne in response to Mr Brown's claims that the majority of drivers would benefit from the reforms: "This destroys the government's defence that this is a green tax and in general gives green taxes a bad name".

Shadow Treasury minister Justine Greening said people saw changes to road tax as "stealth" charges.

The TaxPayers' Alliance said the VED rates were a "cynical tax grab".

However, Friends of the Earth said the Government should "stand firm" over its car tax plans.

Currently, the maximum road tax for a vehicle registered between March 2001 and March 2006 is £210. From April 2010 that will increase to £455 for the heaviest polluters.

Lancashire Evening Post: Car tax hike hits motorists hard

MORE than nine million motorists are to be hit with a bill of up to £245 more under controversial road tax changes, the government has admitted.

The figures released by the Treasury showed that 43% of people will see their bills rise by April 2010 compared to fewer than a fifth who will be better off in real terms.

It is the first time official estimates have been disclosed of winners and losers from the changes - which ministers insist are designed to punish high-polluting cars rather than raise revenue.

The Taxpayers' Alliance has blasted the government for hitting people in the pocket at a time when the price of living is rocketing.

Research director Corin Taylor said: "Ordinary people are finding it hard enough to make ends meet with energy prices, petrol prices and food prices all rocketing and now they are faced with this.

"What the government should be doing is cutting back on its own waste and massive perks rather than hitting people at a time when they can least afford it."

Sheila Ranger, of drivers' group the RAC Foundation, said that the government had made the changes which see the number of tax bands rise from five to 13 "unnecessarily complicated."

She said: "It all relates to the amount of carbon each car emits which is obviously more for older cars, but people will probably not find what they are paying until they pay it."

The latest figures, revealed by Treasury minister Angela Eagle in response to Parliamentary questions, are likely to reignite anger over the reforms. They predict that tax will be increased on 8.7 million vehicles in 2009-10 - all in the six most-polluting bands.

Overall in 2009-10, "a third of cars will be better off in real terms, and in total, approximately 55% of cars will be no worse off" according to the minister. Just over 44% will pay more.

By 2010-11, 9.4m face higher bills - 43% of the predicted number of vehicles on the road. Some 8.4m will lay out around the same, while 1.4m are set to benefit financially.
Experts calculate that the government will have received more than a billion in extra revenue by 2011.

Friday, July 04, 2008

Daily Telegraph: Soaring fuel costs could mean services are cut, warn councils

By Christopher Hope, Home Affairs Editor 

Soaring fuel prices could force local councils to make service cuts, town hall leaders have warned.
The sharp rise in oil prices means the annual cost of running rubbish trucks, gritters and other vehicles has risen from £541 million to £780 million over the past two years, according to the Local Government Association.

But Alistair Darling has dismissed demands for councils to be treated as a special case when it comes to carrying out their "statutory obligations"and be made exempt from fuel duty.

The Chancellor of the Exchequer insisted that everyone was feeling the pinch.

"To do something for councils on their own would be hard to justify," he said.

"Like everyone they have got to anticipate the bills that they might face and they have got to deal with them."

His comments came as the Cut the VAT campaign, which includes the Federation of Master Builders and the TaxPayers' Alliance, warned that likely 20 per cent rises in fuel bills this Autumn could make an extra £300million in VAT for the Treasury.

Blaby District Council warned that its fuel bill was £10,000 a month higher now than last year.

Strategic director Steve Beard warned that projects like intervention programmes for anti-social youths and help for those with mental health problems were at risk.

To ease the pressure, local authorities should be exempted from fuel duty along with emergency services.

Mr Beard said: "We believe that all essential services such as waste collection, fire, police, ambulance, should receive that same treatment.

"It seems crazy that we're paying a hefty slab of tax to the government for something that is absolutely beyond our control and we really must do something to protect communities."

LGA chairman Sir Simon Milton urged local authorities to become more innovative to save energy. He highlighted that some had switched to chip oil and bio-fuels, while Kent County Council was calling for co-operation on bulk-buying.

"Local authorities spend hundreds of millions ensuring that critical services never stop. Yet, like for all vehicle users, councils are seeing their energy bills going through the roof," he said.

"With the cost of fuel escalating, councils, like people, will have to tighten their belts and come up with innovative ways to make their money stretch further.

"Councils cannot stop collecting the bins or stop providing vital services that people need. People rely on us day in day out to provide both the critical services they need and the ones they enjoy.

"With councils already having to tighten their belts, the rising energy costs will be a deeply worrying unwelcome headache."

Daily Express: ‘Retreat' on fuel duty rise...but it's not enough

By Alison Little

The strongest hint yet that the Government will bow to pressure and scrap its planned 2p fuel duty rise came yesterday.

The signal from Gordon Brown and Alistair Darling follows the delivery to Number 10 of a demand for rate cuts signed by 100,000 loyal Daily Express readers. 

Mr Brown was quizzed yesterday about the planned 2p-a-litre rise by the Commons Liaison Committee of senior MPs and said any decision was for the Chancellor to make. But he stressed that many past increases had been cancelled since the mass hauliers’ protest in 2000.

It followed a day of action by lorry drivers who converged on Westminster on Wednesday to highlight the strain that high prices place on their industry. 

The Prime Minister added: “It’s right that having frozen duty in April, it’s time to review the 

situation then make an announcement. I’m not going to make a forecast but it will be looked at very, very carefully over the next few weeks.’’

Separately, Mr Darling also gave hope the rise would be cancelled. The Chancellor admitted that the surge in pump prices, driven by world oil prices which climbed yesterday to a new record high of more than $146 a barrel, was of “huge concern’’ to people.

“It’s primarily driven by the oil crisis but I will need to look at the increase that is due to come in from next October,’’ he said.

Today the Daily Express vowed to keep up its crusade for the Government to go much further – by cutting the existing rate of duty on petrol and diesel, as well as cancelling the October 1 increase, held over from April.

Campaigners yesterday welcomed hope that the 2p rise would be cancelled and joined in urging the Chancellor to go further. Mark Wallace, of the TaxPayers’ Alliance, said: “Things are extremely bad for millions of families and motorists as it is. 

“Of course it’s good if they see sense on the 2p rise but to really make a difference, we need urgent cuts in the rate.’’ 

And a newly formed alliance of transport and industry groups said scrapping the 2p rise as well as future planned hikes was the “absolute minimum’’ that the Government should do.

The group, which includes the AA, British Chambers of Commerce, Freight Transport Association, Petrol Retailers Association and Road Haulage Association, urged ministers to acknowledge “the terrible impact on UK industry and motorists of rapidly increasing oil prices and quickly engage with industry and road user representatives to identify means of relieving the problems.

“As an absolute minimum, the Chancellor must immediately scrap the 2p per litre fuel duty increase planned for October, together with similar proposed increases for 2009 and 2010.”

It added: “The Government has failed to demonstrate that it has understood the serious impact of oil price rises on UK industry and has so far shown no interest in tackling the problem.

“The movement of people, and the delivery of goods and services are key factors in the economy and in the daily needs of the whole population. The price of oil is dramatically changing these processes to the detriment of all.” 

However, Mr Brown dismissed calls to use the Government’s windfall from taxes on North Sea oil companies to pay for duty cuts. He also signalled he was not likely to retreat on controversial plans to increase from next year road tax on the most polluting cars registered since 2001.

Thursday, July 03, 2008

Daily Express: Fuel D-Day - now we deliver your 100,000 PROTESTS TO THE PRIME MINISTER

By Macer Hall and Martyn Brown

GORDON Brown was last night handed 100,000 reasons for slashing the punishing fuel duty that is threatening to paralyse Britain.

The Daily Express’s crusade for a substantial reduction in tax on petrol and diesel was taken right to the door of 10 Downing Street.

The petition signed by 100,000 of  our loyal readers - both the paper and online - makes clear the fury of Middle Britain at Labour’s failure to ease the burden on millions of families.

And our crusade  won backing yesterday from angry hauliers staging their own protest in nearby Parliament Square against rocketing fuel prices.

Our delegation to Downing Street and the Treasury was led by Tory MP and Daily Express columnist Ann Widdecombe.

Speaking on the steps of Number 10, she said: “I am delighted the Daily Express has led this crusade. I hope it is as successful as previous Daily Express crusades.” She added: “Gordon Brown has been over-taxing Britain for 10 years, first as Chancellor and now as Prime Minister.

“He is making it impossible for people on modest incomes to manage. It’s time he understood that the motor car is not a luxury but some people’s necessity.”

Joined by Daily Express chief political commentator Patrick O’Flynn, political editor Macer Hall and reporter Martyn Brown, the petition was formally handed to Mr Brown’s staff.

In line with Downing Street’s strict rules on the acceptance of petitions, a single representative bag containing hundreds of readers’ coupons was handed in to Number 10.

The rest of the coupons were delivered to a nearby civil service depot.

Last night, a Downing Street official said: “We will consider the Daily Express petition and respond in due course.”

Our