Blogs















Blog powered by TypePad

« Royston Crow: Pay details too late for survey | Main | Independent: Joan Bakewell: Why can't the Speaker's Wife use a bus pass? »

Thursday, April 03, 2008

Bromley Times: PM outstripped by town hall chiefs in expenses rich list

COUNCIL bosses are getting paid more than the Prime Minister, research has revealed.

The former chief executive of Bexley council, Nick Johnson, came fifth in the 'Town Hall Rich List' conducted by the Tax Payers Alliance last Thursday.

Mr Johnson was paid £203,000, including an £8,000 bonus and £11,000 for 'choices and election duties' - £14,151 more than Gordon Brown's salary of £188,849.

Bromley council refused to provide full information for the three years they were asked for.

However, they did reveal their chief executive David Bartlett received £154,000 for the year 2006-07.

A spokesman for the Tax Payers Alliance said: "Taxpayers have a right to know how much senior town hall officials are being paid because only then can we judge whether they deserve their remuneration. Too often, council executives are rewarded handsomely even when they fail.

"Families and pensioners are struggling with the demands of yet another council tax rise, and councils owe it to them to cut back on executive pay hikes."

Chairman of Bexley Pensioners Forum, Terry Murphy, said: "The Prime Minister is getting his money from the taxes of the whole country and the chief executives of councils are getting theirs from the council tax payers.

"I agree that the wage should go up each year, but the fact they are getting more money than the Prime Minister is a disgrace.

"They have a much smaller area to look after than him. It is a sorry state that we have to come to this."

A spokesperson for Bromley council said: "The salaries of our senior officers are independently reviewed each year taking into account relevant market factors.

"Given the demanding nature of these roles and that our council tax remains one of the lowest in outer London, we believe this represents good value for money, and in its most recent report the government's independent watchdog judged the council as excellent in it's effective use of resources."

A spokesperson for Bexley council said: "The salary paid to managers and senior officers is set by the council taking into account the recommendations from the Hay Group.

"Seeking their advice helps to ensure that salaries payable to Bexley's officers remain competitive with similar local authorities and organisations.

"The salaries paid to individual members of staff are private, but the council's chief executive receives a salary in the range of £157,000 to £180,000, with the possibility of progression through outstanding performance to £203,391.

"The role of chief executive is significant in scope and accountability. It spans a very large number of technical and professional disciplines, and services to some 220,000 residents, along with a budget of around £0.5 billion."

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/2443942/27720446

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Bromley Times: PM outstripped by town hall chiefs in expenses rich list:

Comments

These people are simply not worth it by any stretch of the imagination are doing nothing more than paralleling the freeloaders at the European Parliament.

During shall we say difficult times a private organisation would probably look at the weight of these salaries and think about loosing some of this burden. There might well be an argument no matter how obscure at justifying someone in the council earning this top dollar wage but for multiples occurences, well that's just a tad expensive. Where are the 'ethics' committees and other "poke their nose into your business" quangos now? These salaries need serious review at the very least. With all these bumper salaries totalled up let's say £900,000 for one council (a very rough estimate) and a council tax bill of say £1200 per household that comes out at 750 homes just to pay their wage bill. Don't even mention the cost of the forthcoming pension OUCH!

To pour further scorn on the subject there appears to be an active resistance against any revelation of how much they are earning, what shades of guilt.

Who chooses the "Independent" assessors ?

No doubt some of the greedy individuals in Westmonster will use this as an excuse to boost their own pay!

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In