Blogs















Blog powered by TypePad

« January 2008 | Main | March 2008 »

February 2008

Wednesday, February 27, 2008

Vacancy on Camden Council Standards Committee

Eye_2Two vacancies have emerged on Camden Council’s Standards Committee for independent residents or members of the public who work in Camden. 

This is an ideal opportunity for TPA activists to hold Camden Councillors to account and see that they abide by the council’s code of conduct. 

This may not have a direct effect on Camden Council’s tax and spending policy, but you will play a valuable role in holding them to account.  Are they misusing taxpayer-funded council property?  Have they voted for an eye watering pay increase, yet not increased their workload accordingly?  There are plenty of questions you can ask to defend the taxpayer’s interest.

You find out more and apply here.

Please do get involved.  It’s up to us to change things, and change starts with you rolling up your sleeves and telling the politicians they’re public servants, not the masters of the people!

A hint of victory in Edinburgh

Edinburgh_celebrations

Taxpayers celebrate in Edinburgh last night

When we published the second Council Spending Uncovered paper on councils' massive publicity spending, Edinburgh City Council came in for quite a bit of criticism when it was revealed they were the biggest spender on spin in Scotland - splashing out £3.4m a year.

So I was delighted to read this article in last night's Edinburgh Evening News:

SPENDING REVELATION LEADS TO CITY SPIN DOCTOR REVIEW

AN independent review of the city council's public relations department is to be launched to ensure it is run efficiently.

The measure, which could lead to cutbacks, comes after it was discovered the local authority spends more on publicity and spin doctors than any other council in Scotland.

Figures published by The Taxpayers Alliance showed the council spent GBP 3.37 million on public relations in 2006/7 - up 118.4 per cent on 1996/7.

The cash has been spent on measures such as press officers, adverts and Outlook, the council's free newspaper.

The council's head of corporate communications, Isabell Reid, said: "It's important to us that both the members and the people of Edinburgh have confidence we are delivering an efficient and cost-effective service."

If this a genuine review that is seriously looking to make savings, it is great news for Edinburgh's taxpayers. It is also an encouraging message for everyone campaigning with the TPA - we are making a difference.

The thinking behind the Council Spending Uncovered series has always been that people deserve to know how their money is being spent, and that taxpayers should be allowed to make their own minds up as to whether their local council's spending is justified.

We've drawn attention to some areas where we think savings can be made on the basis that if taxpayers agree it will put sufficient pressure on councils to tighten things up. There are also many councillors out there whose instinct is to save money and cut out waste but find themselves faced with such a big job, and sometimes with obstructive Officers, that savings can be difficult to pin down. By offering a few suggestions, we hope we can help willing councils to move in the right direction and marshall sufficient public pressure to force even unwilling authorities to make savings.

Edinburgh's decision vindicates that thinking - and congratulations are due to them for doing the best thing for their taxpayers. Of course it doesn't end here; we will be keeping an eagle eye out to see what savings are actually made as a result of the review, and this is the first step on a long road to relieving the appalling burden on taxpayers. Now we've shown the power of this kind of campaigning, though, these kind of victories will be repeated. Taxpayers One - Councils Nil.

Monday, February 25, 2008

TaxPayers' Alliance demands an investigation into the Speaker

Click here for the full text of the letter sent by the TaxPayers' Alliance to Mr John Lyon, Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, requesting an investigation into Michael Martin MP, Speaker of the House of Commons, regarding taxi expenses and alleged attempts by someone in his department to mislead the public over expenses claims:

Download 080225_michael_martin_mp.pdf

Activist Guide Part 4 - Lobbying Councillors

Being an activist in the TPA means you’re not just joining a political pressure group, you’re a guerrilla in our taxpayers’ army.  We want to equip you with all you need to be able to hold your politicians to account as well as securing victories for the taxpayer.  With our national grassroots campaign we’re out to see that you can win victories for your community.  This chapter in our activist guide can help you with direct lobbying, that is pressuring politicians to do what you want them to do!

As a vindication of our ‘story creating’ chapter in the activist guide, we were alerted to the potential councillor pay rise on offer at Bournemouth Council.  Seeing this, I blogged but thought that we could go further.  Comments on the Bournemouth Echo website were extraordinarily hostile to the pay deal.  Yet complaining on a website wouldn’t help.  We had to go directly to the councillors, show the force of our numbers and introduce them to the reality on the ground – taxpayers were not happy with Bournemouth Council increasing Council Tax and increasing their pay.  It just wasn’t on.

Therefore we rallied TPA activists to lobby and persuade councillors to vote against the pay deal.  We may not have defeated the pay deal, but we pushed the opposition on the council to endorsing an independent, taxpayer remuneration panel so that such ridiculous increases can never happen again. 

Our problem was we didn’t have enough activists lobbying Bournemouth Council.  We should have had so many people email Bournemouth Council that their system should have crashed under the weight of our emails.  They should have known the minute they logged into their email account that they were facing electoral disaster if they voted for that pay increase.  That is what we need.  That is your job.  This can be your victory.

This is your campaign to stop the taxman taking your money.  When set piece events such as a crucial vote at Full Council arise, set up your own lobby campaign.  Here’s how to get a lobbying campaign going where you can potentially save the taxpayer money:

1. Let me know of the story at HQ so we can draft in activists nationwide to help you and raise interest in local media.  But we’ll be relying on you to build the campaign up.
2. Find out when the issue affecting your borough is to be voted and where, is it on at a committee, Cabinet or full council meeting?  This way we know how long we have to lobby and who we have to contact.
3. Find out the contact details of the councillors you need to lobby.  You can find out either by going to the ‘Your Council’ area on the council website or by contacting the ‘Democratic Services’ department at your local council.
4. When communicating with councillors, be polite.  We have the moral high ground by the virtue of our arguments, there’s no need to give it away with abusive language.
5. Then you’re set.  Tell your friends, colleagues and neighbours to get lobbying; you have all the information you need to hand.  You’ve made it simple to contact your local councillors and given anyone interested a timeframe to contact your councillors.  Councillors will react to constituent emails first, as is the case from our Bournemouth campaign so your role is extremely important in recruiting local activists to get involved.  Remember:  Politicians only fear losing!  So the more people in your community you get on board, the greater likelihood they will listen!
6. After sending the initial communication, wait a day or until you get a response.  Then fire off your enquiry again.  But keep it simple.  Ask them how they will vote, why they will vote that way and if they will consider changing their mind.
7. Finally:  Never give up!  Our campaign can only get stronger if we can tell taxpayers that we’ve saved communities an £X value.  This shows our campaign is working and that your activism in the TPA gets real results.

There must be hundreds of instances where your council is voting to throw away yet more of your money.  Be it on their expenses, salaries or perks, or on pointless pork-barrel projects, their votes make it happen.  You can change their vote; you can save the taxpayer money.  For too long I heard the phrase “nothing will ever change”, that political action is pointless.  Then I looked around, I looked long and hard at the people telling me nothing will ever change, and saw how they would give in whenever they faced difficulty.  The politicians live the high life, services decline while taxes soar.  They never acted and they suffered the consequences.

Are you going to give in and open your wallet to your council or government to take whatever they want whenever they like?  Or are you going to stand up and do your bit?  Political action needn’t be the deferring defeat to the political class, it can make a real difference to your community.

A spit in the face of hardworking taxpayers

Snouts_in_trough_2Bournemouth Council, in all its arrogance, voted itself the proposed pay deal we tirelessly campaigned against over the past two weeks.  Last Thursday the Council awarded themselves a 17% pay increase, the Cabinet gave themselves an astonishing 32% pay increase and the leader awarded himself a 34% pay increase.  In the same meeting, the Council voted for a 4.9% Council Tax increase, the maximum amount given the 5% cap imposed on councils.  You don’t have to be Sherlock Holmes to know where your Council Tax rise is going.

Despite persistent lobbying from hard-working TaxPayers’ Alliance activists and campaigners, we managed to rally the opposition on Bournemouth Council to stand against these rises recommended by an independent panel which, as it turned out, wasn’t that independent at all

Bournemouth Council is yet to publish online the minutes for the Full Council meeting, but nevertheless if you are still unaware how your councillor voted you can click the link here to find your councillor’s contact details.  Already the Bournemouth Echo story reporting the massive pay hike has 94 comments from apoplectic taxpayers demanding action over such snout-in-the-trough greed.  Feel free to add your disgust at this prime example of gravy-train politics.

If you’re angry, then help us form a Bournemouth branch of the TaxPayers’ Alliance.  If you want to hold these politicians to account, then join us and contact me to get involved.  We showed Bournemouth Council our strength in the sheer number of activists who lobbied and contacted Bournemouth councillors to protest against the pay increases.  Although we didn’t get the result we wanted, we came close as I understand there were wobbles from several Tory councillors who knew just how unpopular this pay deal was.  With your help next time, with your input we can force the politicians to climb down and see that you, the taxpayer, have had a direct say over how they spend your money.  Nothing will change if you don’t get involved!

Thursday, February 21, 2008

Stop Harlow Council funding Town Hall fat cats

SEE UPDATE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE

Tonight at 7PM Bournemouth Council vote on their allowances, which we have been campaigning and lobbying against for the past week.  Thanks go to Jonathan Sheppard, Peter Roberts, Christopher Way, Linda Berkeley, Vivienne Reed, Ed Hallam, Mohammed Hasan, John Sheperd and many others who helped lobby for lower taxes and against such outrageous salaries for a council Cabinet clearly failing the taxpayers in Bournemouth.

Yet, tonight we also see another example of local government snouts in the trough.  We were alerted to this story by TPA supporter Robert Halfon.

Harlow Council will vote at their full council this evening on their medium term financial strategy.  As part of this strategy is a cost cutting measure.  That cost cutting measure involves the top 10 officers earmarking themselves almost £100,000 for a "pay review" before 2010.  Do you see the problem? 

In addition to this, £98,000 has also been set aside for future pay increases for senior officers.  Finally, and this is all we know from the story so God knows what we’ll find when we dig around, a further £106,000 is allocated for the possibility of a vacant strategic director post to be filled after 2009.  You can read the full story here.

We've well in Bournemouth, and who knows we might even win tonight, so let’s do even more in Harlow to keep the momentum going.  This is your money going into the pockets of Council officers, unaccountable bureaucrats taking more and more money from frontline services, the services you expect and demand.  The Audit Commission only give Harlow Council 2-stars for the handling of its finances and providing value for money, so this is hardly surprising.  Now is the time for you to make yet another stand for your rights as taxpayers.  Here is a list of every councillor in Harlow, please contact them and ask them to vote against this shocking pay hike for Town Hall fat cats:

Cllr Sean Folan (Labour) - (01279) 427575 / sean.folan@harlow.gov.uk
Cllr Leslie Rideout (Lib Dem) - (01279) 437541 / lesley.rideout@harlow.gov.uk
Cllr Robert Thurston (Lib Dem) - (01279) 864777 / robert.thurston@harlow.gov.uk
Cllr Simon Carter (Con) - (01279) 429443 / simon.carter@harlow.gov.uk
Cllr Tony Hall (Con) - (01279) 445897 / tony.hall@harlow.gov.uk
Cllr Andrew Johnson (Con) - (01279) 865673 / andrew.johnson@harlow.gov.uk
Cllr Rob Eschle (Labour) - (01279) 425785 / rob.eschle@harlow.gov.uk
Cllr Eleanor Macey (Lib Dem) - (01279) 324193 / eleanor.macy@harlow.gov.uk
Cllr Christopher Millington (Lib Dem) - (01279) 864777 / chris.millington@harlow.gov.uk
Cllr Michael Garnett (Con) - (01279) 437401 / michael.garnett@harlow.gov.uk
Cllr Muriel Jolles (Con) - (01279) 432242 / muriel.jolles@harlow.gov.uk
Cllr Sue Livings (Con) - (01279) 422339 / sue.livings@harlow.gov.uk
Cllr Jean Clark (Labour) - (01279) 423474 / jean.clark@harlow.gov.uk
Cllr Anthony Durcan (Labour) - 07967 138663 / anthony.durcan@harlow.gov.uk.
Cllr Mike Danvers (Labour) - 01279 425934 / michael.danvers@harlow.gov.uk
Cllr Margaret Hulcoop (Labour) - (01279) 452252 / margaret.hulcoop@harlow.gov.uk
Cllr Gregory Peck (Labour) - (01279) 433604 / greg.peck@harlow.gov.uk
Cllr Mark Wilkinson (Labour) - 07866 433991 / mark.wilkinson@harlow.gov.uk
Cllr Eddie Johnson (Con) - (01279) 324689 / eddie.johnson@harlow.gov.uk
Cllr Joshua Jolles (Con) - (01279) 432242 / joshua.jolles@harlow.gov.uk
Cllr Patrick McClarnon (Labour) - (01279) 441702 / patrick.mcclarnon@harlow.gov.uk
Cllr Ian Jackson (Lib Dem) - (01279) 416138 / ian.jackson@harlow.gov.uk
Cllr Linda Pailing (Lib Dem) - (01279) 305802 / linda.pailing@harlow.gov.uk
Cllr Edna Stevens (Labour) - (01279) 324183 / edna.stevens@harlow.gov.uk
Cllr Su Lawton (Lib Dem) - (01279) 300938 / su.lawton@harlow.gov.uk
Cllr Lorna Spenceley (Lib Dem) - (01279) 324676 / lorna.spenceley@harlow.gov.uk
Cllr Lee Dangerfield (Con) - (01279) 833515 / lee.dangerfield@harlow.gov.uk
Cllr Nicholas Churchill (Con) - (01279) 621094 / nick.churchill@harlow.gov.uk
Cllr John Paul Goddard (Independent) - (01279) 416455 / john.goddard@harlow.gov.uk
Cllr Sarah-Jane Dangerfield (Con) - (01279) 8335515 / sarah.dangerfield@harlow.gov.uk
Cllr Kevin Brooks (Labour) - (01279) 302856 / kevin.brooks@harlow.gov.uk
Cllr Bob Davis (Labour) - (01279) 319117 / bob.davis@harlow.gov.uk
Cllr David Carter (Con) - (01279) 420340  / david.carter@harlow.gov.uk

A few points to note:

1. Independent councillor John Paul Goddard is quoted in the story as wanting to block the pay increases
2. This is a matter of taxpayers’ money being misspent
3. Harlow Council is no overall control, so use that to your advantage when lobbying the councillors to vote against this pay increase for council bureaucrats.

Keep up the great work, folks and spread the message.  The more people we have involved in our grassroots campaigns, the stronger we will be and the more the politicians will listen.  Now, once more into the breach…

UPDATE:

It appears that, after an outcry, the council have overturned these plans for big pay rises.  False alarm.

Tuesday, February 19, 2008

How you can help taxpayers this Thursday!

This Thursday will see Bournemouth Council vote on its pay increases we detail here.  Since last Thursday we’ve been lobbying hard for the full council to reconsider this plan and we have to keep up the pressure.  How can it be right that a council loses a star rating from the Audit Commission then uses a 4.9% Council Tax increase to push their salaries up by well over 17% for councillors, and 30%+ for the cabinet.

In the real world, if you or I don’t get results – we lose our jobs.  Yet Bournemouth’s Cabinet think they can get away with rewarding failure.

Not on my watch!

If you’re free on Thursday evening and live in or around Bournemouth, please go to the Full Council on Thursday 21 February at 7PM and sit in the public gallery, as is your right.  You can also put a question to Bournemouth Council’s Cabinet by simply emailing sarah.coley@bournemouth.gov.uk with your question on councillor pay BY 6PM TONIGHT.

Ask them why they want to reward failure with taxpayers’ money!

You can find travel directions here and a map to the Town Hall here.

Please turn up and make your voice heard.  But also if you can’t turn up, please continue to lobby Bournemouth’s councillors.  You can find the contact details of those we have not heard replies from here.

It’s times like these that we can challenge the mistaken belief that you can’t change anything in politics.  We’re close to achieving a breakthrough for direct taxpayer lobbying, normal people campaigning to stop politicians wasting our money.  You can make that change.  By just taking that small amount of time in your day to lobby Bournemouth Council, you could save the taxpayer money.  Not bad for 10 minutes work…

Monday, February 18, 2008

When did bad become good?

There's been a lot of coverage given to the latest proposal from "public health expert" and Chairman of Health England Professor Julian Le Grand, namely that the smoking ban has not gone far enough and smokers should have to buy a licence to purchase tobacco in future.

Even if we ignore the unparalleled idiocy questionable logic of calling one's philosophy "libertarian paternalism" (presumably drawn from the fine intellectual tradition of free market Communism and tolerant racism), the idea is unpleasant even in its implementation.

Smokers have to pay £10 on top of the existing tobacco duty, but that would only be one thrust of the deterrent. He actually intends to put the awkwardness and incompetence of public sector bureaucracy to use deliberately - the licence service will be unco-operative and hard to use on purpose:

He said it was the inconvenience of getting a permit - as much as the cost - that would deter people from persisting with the smoking habit.

"You've got to get a form, a complex form - the government's good at complex forms; you have got to get a photograph." (BBC News Online)

Since when did the thorny tangle of government forms become a good thing? We should be moving away from complex, difficult bureaucracy, not deliberately expanding it.

Whilst he's utterly wrong on almost all counts, it is at least notable that an NHS agency has just admitted on record that the public sector has an appalling habit of setting up impenetrable forms that put people off using services.

Presumably the message was approved by the other members of Health Britain, on whose behalf Prof Le Grand speaks, in which case the Chief Executive of NICE, the Deputy Chief Medical Officer, the Department of Health's Chief Economist, Chief Knowledge Officer and Director General of Social Care and 13 other leading civil servants and experts have also just diagnosed the real problem with healthcare in this country - bureaucracy. Whilst it's a refreshingly open diagnosis, it is somewhat depressing that they have decided to encourage the disease rather than cure it.

When did bad become good?

There's been a lot of coverage given to the latest proposal from "public health expert" and Chairman of Health England Professor Julian Le Grand, namely that the smoking ban has not gone far enough and smokers should have to buy a licence to purchase tobacco in future.

Even if we ignore the unparalleled idiocy questionable logic of calling one's philosophy "libertarian paternalism" (presumably drawn from the fine intellectual tradition of free market Communism and tolerant racism), the idea is unpleasant even in its implementation.

Smokers have to pay £10 on top of the existing tobacco duty, but that would only be one thrust of the deterrent. He actually intends to put the awkwardness and incompetence of public sector bureaucracy to use deliberately - the licence service will be unco-operative and hard to use on purpose:

He said it was the inconvenience of getting a permit - as much as the cost - that would deter people from persisting with the smoking habit.

"You've got to get a form, a complex form - the government's good at complex forms; you have got to get a photograph." (BBC News Online)

Since when did the thorny tangle of government forms become a good thing? We should be moving away from complex, difficult bureaucracy, not deliberately expanding it.

Whilst he's utterly wrong on almost all counts, it is at least notable that an NHS agency has just admitted on record that the public sector has an appalling habit of setting up impenetrable forms that put people off using services.

Presumably the message was approved by the other members of Health Britain, on whose behalf Prof Le Grand speaks, in which case the Chief Executive of NICE, the Deputy Chief Medical Officer, the Department of Health's Chief Economist, Chief Knowledge Officer and Director General of Social Care and 13 other leading civil servants and experts have also just diagnosed the real problem with healthcare in this country - bureaucracy.

Keep the pressure on Bournemouth Council

Dear TPA supporters,

Thank you to all those who lobbied Bournemouth’s councillors this past weekend over their pay deal that would see their salaries rise by 17%, the cabinet by 32% and the leader by 34%.  This pay deal comes after Bournemouth council dropped a star to a 2 star rating from the Audit Commission, compared to 83% of other councils who have 3 or more stars.  We can’t allow councils like Bournemouth to use taxpayers’ money to reward failure! 

As a result of our lobbying, the following councillors have declared they will vote against the pay deal:

Basil Ratcliffe
Pat Lewis
Claire Smith 
Richard Smith
Roger West
Carol Ainge
Sue Levell
Ronald Whittaker

Therefore can I ask that you no longer lobby these councillors and concentrate on those that haven’t replied to emails or are wavering?

Some councillors have yet to make up their mind.  Please make these points to the undecided councillors to express taxpayers’ frustration at the pay deal:
(a) The Independent Remuneration Panel only makes unbinding recommendations to councillors on their pay – they can reject the deal.
(b) Bournemouth can lead the way in delivering taxpayer value for money by rejecting the pay deal.
(c) The government can barely afford to give front line public servants - police and teachers – more money.  What message does it send when councillors give themselves a 17% pay increase?
(d) If they reply asking if you’re a constituent, be honest.  Even if you don’t live in Bournemouth, your taxes go to fund local government under the granting system.  This is not just a local issue and they should have to explain how a pay increase of 17, 32 and 34% would be value for money and see an increase in councillor activity by such rates. 
(e) Finally, if they will vote for the pay deal, ask them if Bournemouth council’s level of service will go up by the same percentage.

The wavering councillors you should direct these points to are:

Cllr Robert Lawton (Con) - 07974 215933 / robert.lawton@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Andrew Morgan (Con) - andrew.morgan@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Rod Cooper (Con) - rod.cooper@bournemouth.gov.uk

All other councillors are yet to respond, so please keep lobbying them.  You can find the contact details for the other councillors by following this link to our campaign blog.

As you can see already, we’re getting some good coverage of this campaign.  There’s only three days left for us to capitalise and lobby to get Bournemouth Council to back down over this pay deal.  Please take only five minutes of your day to contact Bournemouth’s councillors and fight on behalf of Bournemouth’s taxpayers. 

Thank you for all your help and efforts, keep up the excellent work!

Best wishes,

Tim Aker
Grassroots Coordinator
www.taxpayersalliance.com

Friday, February 15, 2008

The click on the line...

...may well be HM Revenue and Customs, now that the Serious Crime Act has come into power, giving HMRC "across the board" powers to listen in on phone calls, intercept emails and letters and bug homes and cars. Powers that were previously only granted for investigating drug and firearms offences are going to be used against people suspected of not calculating their tax return properly. 

Livesofothers_2There are a multitude of problems with this, so many that it's difficult to know where to start, in fact.

Let's begin with the question of privacy and data security. HMRC, and indeed the public sector in general, hardly has a glowing record of protecting the information that it already has. If this organisation cannot be trusted with the names, addresses and bank account details of people in receipt of benefits, should we really trust them to record private conversations and open personal correspondence?

Furthermore, will they be any good at using the new powers? As I mentioned earlier, they've previously been able to listen in on people involved in firearms and drug crimes. Judging from the boom in both types of offence, HMRC perhaps need more time to focus on these issues rather than having a long list of other crimes to use bugging on as well.

There is very little evidence that bugging powers will actually be of any use even if HMRC suddenly became good at their job, either. How many of these small fry that the Revenue will be able to use the powers on do actually email their friends or phone their accountant to brag about their wicked ways?

The timing of the new powers is not just unfortunate given the recent collapse of confidence in HMRC, it is remarkably clumsy given recent news about the horrendous scale of bugging in Britain. Apparently more than 600 public bodies including many local councils have got intercept powers, and over 1,000 requests for intercepts and bugging are made every day. The Interception of Communciations Commissioner has already expressed concerns that over 1,000 people a year are wrongly bugged due to admin errors or monitored without proper permission.

The simple fact is that not only are these new powers intrusive, they are over-complicating HMRC's job - a job that they have more than shown they are struggling to do properly already, and which hardly needs yet more complexity. When will they realise that simpler structures are easier to run?

Can you spare just 5 minutes of your day?

Yesterday we blogged this story here about Bournemouth Council’s cabinet approving a salary deal that would see their pay skyrocket by 32%.  Within this pay package is a 36% increase for the Deputy Leader and a 34% increase for the Leader of the council, taking his salary to £36,000 a year!  These recommendations by the council’s ‘Independent’ Remuneration Panel were all passed by the Cabinet, without debate, this week.  Next week the Full Council votes on this remuneration package.  It’s up to us to lobby the council to reject this pay hike. 

If you’re living in Bournemouth, can you say that the quality of council services has gone up by 34%?  Of course not.  The Audit Commission report last week gave Bournemouth Council a mere 2 star rating.  To compare, the Audit Commission have 3 or 4 stars to 83% of all councils meaning Bournemouth Council has to justify this excessive pay rise for, what has been judged as, under performance.

Bournemouth’s taxpayers need your help.  Please take five minutes out of your day to send an email or call a Bournemouth Councillor to ask them to challenge and reject the councillor remuneration package at the next Full Council meeting on Thursday 21st February.

Below is a list of Bournemouth’s Councillors and their phone and email details.  Please call or email one, two or even all of them if you have the time and lobby them to reject the pay deal on Thursday.  If you can’t or don’t have the time to make these calls or send emails then please pass this blog onto other concerned taxpayers who want to do something about spiralling councillor salaries and high council tax.  The point is to urge these councillors to put taxpayer value-for-money first.  Politely ask the councillors to challenge the pay deal and to vote against it. 

Cllr Alexander Adams (Con) - 07968 123484 / alexander.adams@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Carol Ainge (Lib Dem) - carol.ainge@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Mark Anderson (Con) - 01202 775483 / mark.anderson@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Sue Anderson (Con) - 01202 397047 / sue.anderson@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Linda Bailey (Con) - linda.bailey@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Beryl Baxter (Labour) - Beryl.baxter@Bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr John Beesley (Con) - 07860 391219 / john.beesley@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Derek Borthwick (Independent) - derek.borthwick@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Robert Chapman (Con) - 01202 532778 /  robert.chapman@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Stephen Chappell (Con) - stephen.chappell@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Peter Charon (Con) - 07775556132 / 01202299996 / peter.charon@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Eddie Coope (Con) - eddie.coope@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Elaine Cooper (Con) - elaine.cooper@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Rod Cooper (Con) - rod.cooper@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Nigel Cowley (Con) - 07709 431241 / nigel.cowley@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Sue Cowley (Con) - 07709 431241 / sue.cowley@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Malcolm Davies (Con) - malcolm.davies@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Heather Drayton (Con) - heather.drayton@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Beverley Dunlop (Con) - 07855 395117 / beverley.dunlop@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Michael Everingham (Independent) - 0794 115 2242 / michael.everingham@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Anne Filer (Con) - 01202 399205 / anne.filer@bournemouth.gov.uk; mayor@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Michael Filer (Con) - michael.filer@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Barry Goldbart (Con) - 07734 211750 / barry.goldbart@bournemouth.gov.uk

Cllr Nicola Greene (Con) - 07961 936387 / nicola.greene@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Michael Griffiths (Con) - 07815 817222 / michael.griffiths@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Ben Grower (Labour) - 07714 344635 / ben.grower@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Paul Hughes (Con) - 07732 169122 / paul.hughes@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr David Kelsey (Con) - 07816 417675 / david.kelsey@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Nick King (Con) - 07771727402 / nick.king@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Ian Lancashire (Con) - ian.lancashire@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Robert Lawton (Con) - 07974 215933 / robert.lawton@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Sue Levell (Lib Dem) - Sue.Levell@Bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Pat Lewis (Lib Dem) - 07742 900717 / pat.lewis@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Stephen Macloughlin (Con) - 01202 513229 / stephen.macloughlin@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Jane Montrose (Con) - 07843 062222 / jane.montrose@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Andrew Morgan (Con) - andrew.morgan@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Ian Newport (Con) - 07971 602296 / ian.newport@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Lisa Northover (Lib Dem) - 07515355982 / lisa.northover@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Lynda Price (Con) - lynda.price@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Basil Ratcliffe (Con) - basil.ratcliffe@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Anne Rey (Independent) - 07973 814382 / anne.rey@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Christopher Rochester (Con) - christopher.rochester@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Allister Russell (Con) - allister.russell@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr David Shaw (Con) - 07951 511287 / david.shaw@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Claire Smith (Lib Dem) - Claire.smith@Bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr David Smith (Con) - 07832 186424 / david.smith@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Richard Smith (Lib Dem) - 0780 8227276 / richard.smith@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Philip Stanley-Watts (Con) - philip.stanley-watts@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Ted Taylor (Labour) - ted.taylor@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr John Trickett (Con) - 07910 011239 / john.trickett@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Christopher Wakefield (Con) - 07775 677162 / christopher.wakefield@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Michael Weinhonig (Con) - 07877 430667 / michael.weinhonig@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Roger West (Lib Dem) - roger.west@bournemouth.gov.uk
Cllr Ronald Whittaker (Independent) - ronald.whittaker@bournemouth.gov.uk

This is a test of our grassroots campaigns.  If we make enough calls to Bournemouth’s councillors and show the strength of feeling against this incredibly high pay deal at the taxpayer’s expense, we can show other councils that we won’t tolerate unjust increases elsewhere.  Please take just 5 minutes to make that call or send that email that could make all the difference.  Do let us know how many calls you’ve made and blind copy me (tim.aker@taxpayersalliance.com) into the emails you send.  The activist who lobbies the most will get a free copy of ‘How to label a goat’ by Ross Clark as a way to thank you for your dedication. 

Finally, pass on this blog to anyone interested who might want to get involved in our grassroots campaign for lower taxes.  This is your campaign, it's time we made our voice heard! 

Thursday, February 14, 2008

Bournemouth council pay increase - get involved!

Barnet_14108_006_aWho reading this can say they’ve had a 34% pay increase this year, or could expect one next year?  If you’re the leader of Bournemouth Council, you can because you just voted for it.  The decision by Bournemouth Council’s cabinet to increase their pay takes the leader’s salary to £36,000 a year.  Cabinet members  will also see an increase of 32%.  In fact, Bournemouth councillors can hand themselves a staggering increase of 17%, all coming from recommendations put forward by the council’s ‘Independent’ Remuneration Panel to be voted on at next week’s council meeting.

But the fight isn’t over.  Bournemouth Council’s cabinet may have approved this, but the Council hasn’t voted on it yet.  There is still time to fight this outrageous pay increase.

This is where you come in as independent campaigning taxpayers.  You’re paying for these snouts in the trough scrambling to fill their pockets with your money.  It’s time for you to stand up and make your voice heard.

First, call your local radio station to ask them to run a story on this.  BBC Radio Solent covers Dorset, so call their news desk on 02380 631 311 or send an email to radio.solent@bbc.co.uk.

You can contact BBC Dorset on 01305 250992 or by email at dorset@bbc.co.uk to get them to run a story on this on the BBC website.

Write to your local newspaper urging Bournemouth’s taxpayers to complain to their councillor.  Simply send an email to the Bournemouth Echo at newsdesk@bournemouthecho.co.uk

Hold your councillor to account and ask them to vote against this increase next week.  You can find your councillor by clicking here.  Ask them why they increased council tax, why they increased their pay but also plead poverty in claiming Bournemouth is a ‘cash strapped’ council.  It might be worth sending an email to the leader of Bournemouth Council, Stephen Macloughlin, by sending him an email to stephen.macloughlin@bournemouth.gov.uk asking why he deserves an increase of 34%.  If you get a reply, let me know by forwarding it to tim.aker@taxpayersalliance.com.  It would be interesting to see how he defends himself to such scrutiny.

Finally, recruit to the TaxPayers’ Alliance.  If Bournemouth sees a massive rise in TPA membership as a result of this, the politicians will know the people are fed up of their Gravy Train politics and want a fairer deal.  By joining the TPA you’ll tell the politicians you want lower taxes, you want transparent and accountable government and that you’re not going to sit by as professional politicians bleed scarce resources from frontline services.

Wednesday, February 13, 2008

More innovation from Hammersmith and Fulham

You may recall that back in December we singled out publicity budgets as one area of council spending packed with savings just waiting to be made. The average council spends almost £1 million on publicity, with huge amounts going on local newspaper adverts and those glossy propaganda newsletters that everyone throws away as soon as they come through your letter box.

Hammersmith and Fulham, who have recently announced yet another 3% cut in council tax, much to the relief of hard-pressed taxpayers, are leading the way on making savings on publicity. In just one year they achieved savings of 35%, an example which other councils would do well to follow.

Their latest idea is using YouTube to publicise their activities - producing this video:

Now whether you're a Status Quo fan or not, this is a great move - let's look at the figures.

  • The video cost £500 to make, and is hosted for free on YouTube. That is only half the price of a quarter page advert in their local newspaper (which has a circulation of only a few thousand).
  • It's been viewed online by 4,600 people already, and it was reported in a half-page article in the Evening Standard (circulation 300,000).

It is exactly this kind of original, innovative thinking that allows Hammersmith and Fulham to make massive savings from unnecessary expenditure. They are relieving the burden of council tax on local residents and achieving 4-Star status from the Audit Commission at the same time.

We should all be urging our councils to follow H&F's example - they prove that it can be done, irrespective of the settlement provided by central government, and that there is hope for local government.

Councils have to realise that simply blaming Westminster for all their ills (and Westminster has indeed managed things badly) is no solution. If the Government won't help, it is down to councils to knock themselves into shape. Don't get mad, get even.

Monday, February 11, 2008

Activist Guide: Part 3 - Leafleting

Sany0071_2Over the past two weeks, you know how you can easily contribute to the TPA campaign from your home.  You can research into news stories to find anything for us to campaign on relevant to our crusade for lower taxes and better government.  You can follow this up with letters to your local paper, to kick start debates and turn your local community into a TPA supporter-base.

Now what if you want to do more…how can you actively recruit members to the TPA?

The first step, possibly the easiest, is to recruit your friends and family just by recommending us to them, inviting them to have a look at the TPA website where they can find taxpayers just like you campaigning for lower taxes.  Even if this comes up in casual conversation, whether talking about the price of petrol or the rubbish not being collected, plug the TPA because our message of lower taxes and smaller, better government is relevant because your money is being wasted! 

Furthermore, if people are complaining about taxes and the government, challenge them to do something about it.  Complaining won’t change anything, but recruiting, persuading and holding government to account will!

The next step is to get out there leafleting.  You can get TPA leaflets sent to you by emailing me at tim.aker@taxpayersalliance.com and telling me how many you want to hand out so I can post them to you that day.  Our leaflets have the bonus of being freepost, giving you a greater return on your time volunteering for the TPA.  Simply leafleting your street, block of flats or leaving a pile (with permission, of course) at your local post office counter can make all the difference to our continuous recruitment strategy.

From then on in, if we have enough members to build a branch in your area, you can look to cover your ward or borough with TPA leaflets.  If you’re doing this, ask your council for a map of your council ward (it is your money after all, so may as well make some use of it) so you can mark off the areas already leafleted.  Furthermore, it’ll help us note which areas are good for us depending on leaflet returns.

In taking that valuable time out of your day to leaflet for the TPA, you could even recruit more activists willing to share the load and leaflet more often.  This is vital to our expansion as a mass movement the political class has to listen to.  We’ve been lectured for years on the need for taxes to go up to pay for better ‘services’.  What returns have we seen?  You need only look at hospital infection rates, falling standards in education and an inflated government bureaucracy to know where your money is being misspent.  The people are out there and becoming more receptive to our positive message, it’s up to you to help us pass on that message, to engage with the public and force the politicians to lower our taxes and cut wasteful spending.  Every bit you do really helps the cause.

Thursday, February 07, 2008

An image that says a thousand words...

Bengali

...just not in English

The above was found on the Freedom of Information page at North Lincolnshire Council's website.  From their census in 2001, 2.5% of residents were from an ethnic minority, who this service is aimed at.  Needless to say the Freedom of Information request is in the post to see how much is spent on this service for what is barely 3,000 people.

Audit Commission report into local government

MoneyThe Audit Commission today released its performance evaluation of councils in the UK.  They report that 83% of councils received a 3 or 4 (maximum) star status, a 3% increase from 2006.  Surprisingly, no councils were in the lowest ranked category with 13 Councils achieving the 4 stars and ‘improving strongly’ grade from the Commission.

Is this accurate?  Is this how you feel about your council?

Ten years of council tax rises leading to well over 100% increases in council tax.  The average Council spends a million pounds on their own self-promotion and councils have seen an explosion in middle managers earning over £50,000

Looking deeper in the statistics, let’s see how some of these '4 star' councils compare to the research we’ve produced:

Kent County Council, ranked 4 star and ‘strongly improving’ by the Audit Commission spent £6.5million on its own publicity (a 357% increase in ten years) and employ 713 bureaucrats earning over £50,000 a year (that’s up from only 37 in 1997).

Tameside Council, 4 stars, employed only 10 middle managers earning over £50,000 in 1997.  Now they employ 147.

Camden, another 4 star council, spends £3.5million on its publicity and employs 191 middle managers on over £50,000, costing Camden’s taxpayers £12.3million a year.

Value for money?  Worth four stars?  Of course not!  One council, Hammersmith and Fulham, deserves 4 starts because it’s cutting council tax; it’s cutting their self promotion budget.  It’s delivering frontline services, like 24-hour policing.  That is worth four stars because it’s got the basics right, it’s giving people the services they expect. 

The others, week on week, advertise for middle management, filling their council offices with more and more drains on public finances.  Government is growing, taking more of our money in tax to create more excuses for its own existence.  Our services are declining because the politicians and bureaucrats cannot manage the provision of services from a monolithic, top-down superstructure.  We don’t need a report to be told what our councils are like.  On the streets people know what their councils are up to; the people are over-taxed, see their bins collected less and less and yet find councils continuously advertising for middle management.  And no amount of propaganda from councils or commissions is going to convince us otherwise!

Monday, February 04, 2008

Dispatches from the front line

Here is something for our Kent supporters from Dr. Sean Gabb who has passed on this interesting opportunity from Kent.

The "Kent on Sunday" newspaper has arranged a question and answer session with Gordon Brown. Apparently, Mr Brown has promised to answer any questions the people of Kent may feel inclined to ask by sending e-mails to Jamie.mcginnes@kosmedia.co.uk.

If you want to ask a question, you need to live in Kent, and you need to prove this by giving your address. You also need, for some reason, to give your age.

This is a good chance to put Gordon Brown on the spot over tax. 

Ask him why he has put up stealth taxes yet hospital infections are at record levels.

Ask him why Council Tax has doubled since 1997 yet councils still charge for rubbish and bin collections.

Ask him how he can spend so much inflating the public sector whilst pensioners struggle to pay such high council tax bills.

Do let us know how you get on and if Gordon answers you!

- - -

TonyflynnTPA Activist in Norfolk Tony Flynn, pictured, delivered over 150 leaflets in Harleston, over the weekend.  We’ll keep you updated with how many leaflets we see returned from Harleston.  As it stands our Norfolk branch has well over 80 members and is becoming a very, very strong campaigning unit for the TPA.  We’ll see over the year whether they get much competition or run away with it.  If you would like some TPA leaflets to hand out, please email me at tim.aker@taxpayersalliance.com and I can put them in the post to you.

Activist Guide: Part 2 - Letters

You can never write enough letters as a TPA activist.  Our goal is to make a majority of taxpayers in this country support lower taxes, so it’s up to you to help us focus local and national political debates on our issues.  Letters to newspapers, be they on local or national issues, do just that.  Never underestimate their importance.  Letters represent the views of ordinary taxpayers; they give you a forum to express your views.  As a community forum, sometimes you see debates emerging and issues rising in their importance because on local ratepayer highlighted an issue on everyone’s mind.

As you can no doubt see from the majority of our current crop of politicians, politicians shouldn’t be left alone to do the politics.  We have to have our say and this is where you come in.

So this week, our activist guide will first of all urge you to write that letter that can trigger a local debate.  But we’re also here to offer you titbits and hints to write letters that hit the mark, what letter editors look for and how we can increase the profile of the TaxPayers’ Alliance in these debates.  Here are our tips this week:

1. First and foremost, keep it brief.  Making a point in less than 300 words has a better chance of getting printed, read and understood.  Look at your local letters page and see the size of the average letter.  Editors try to fit in as many letters as possible, so have a look at how much is being written before handing in an essay to the editor.
2. Send two letters, one on a national tax issue, and perhaps one on a local issue to add variety to the coverage we get.  If you don’t have the time to write two letters, then just send one.  The important thing is to get the issues out there and to show how active our campaign is.
3. Always sign off as a TaxPayers Alliance supporter.  This is your campaign to see you keep more of your money, be proud of it and make people aware of the campaign for lower taxes.

In all those hints should give you some idea of the ideal campaign letter.  Short, concise and always mentioning the TPA.  Name recognition brings issue saliency.  The more people know about us, the more they’ll know what we stand for and, potentially, join us and continuing the cycle.  But the content, naturally, matters too.  Try and get in two to three killer facts, facts that stand out.  TPA Activist Brian Sturman is very adept at getting in facts that make the statement for him.  See below for an example:

Sir,
Many pensioners will be unhappy to lose a third of their basic pension paying council tax, under duress and sacrifice to their lowered standard of living, knowing it is all to be squandered on the disgraceful pay levels for county council senior bureaucrats?   For example, the Chief Executive (Report, 3 Feb), receives every month about £17,000, (equal to over three times annual basic pension!).

Yours sincerely,   Brian Sturman.  (Taxpayers Alliance supporter)

That is the ideal TPA letter.  It makes a statement, provides examples to reinforce the argument and can be read within a minute.  Above all, it can get people’s attention and spur them into joining the campaign, writing more letters and getting more people involved.

So, in sum, keep those letters straight and to the point.  More importantly, keep ‘em coming.  Bit by bit we’re getting our message out and showing that even by giving us 10 minutes of your time a week, you can have a great impact in the campaign as a TPA activist.

Friday, February 01, 2008

South Norfolk District Council to freeze Council Tax

Barnet_14108_006_aThe TaxPayers’ Alliance today welcomed the decision by South Norfolk District Council to freeze its Council Tax for the coming year.  This should hopefully set a precedent for future councils in Norfolk to follow South Norfolk’s lead and work to trim budgets, make efficiency savings and cut taxes. 

As we have shown, and will continue to do so, non-essential spending is running out of control.  The average council in Britain spends a million pounds on its own self-congratulatory publicity.  One hundred pounds out of the average Band D Council Tax bill goes to inflating council middle management on over £50,000 a year.  Although South Norfolk have done well in announcing a freeze in Council Tax, Hammersmith and Fulham have gone further in cutting Council Tax by 3% for the second successive year.  As the saying goes, “there’s still work to be done”.

Congratulations should also go to TPA Campaigners in Norfolk who have tirelessly campaigned against high Council Tax for so long, including our allies from Folk Against Council Tax.  Any councillors and council officials reading this, however, should know they’re not being let off lightly.  We want tax cuts, and we’ll continue to hold councils to account to see that we get the essential services at minimal cost to the taxpayer.

This is exactly the tide in opinion we are looking to secure – the majority for lower taxes, a majority who will not vote for any party whatsoever that increases taxes.  We’re out to change the political culture and, bit by bit, we are.

If you would like to join our Norfolk branch of the TaxPayers' Alliance, do contact me on 0203 051 8144 or by emailing tim.aker@taxpayersalliance.com and I can put you in touch with our hardworking activists in Norfolk.